PDA

View Full Version : TOM YUM GOONG hitting US screens next month! And cut!


udar55
07-11-2006, 03:47 PM
From Twitch:

"The Weinstein Company has announced a North American release date of August 25th for the follow up to Ong Bak. No word yet how widespread the release will be, but it's coming soon, at least. This will be the shorter cut of the film requested by international sales"

Not much time for a advertising lead up. Oh, and it is re-titled THE PROTECTOR (Jackie shakes his head).

www.twitchfilm.net/archives/006796.html (http://www.twitchfilm.net/archives/006796.html)

iron flag
07-11-2006, 06:53 PM
Just saw it the other day here in Germany and I must admit, other than the (UNBELEIVABLE!!!) action scenes, probably one of the worst movies I've ever seen. :lol

The Running Man
07-11-2006, 07:22 PM
iron flag,

:rollin

So true...so true...

:rollin

BKarza
07-11-2006, 07:30 PM
is good and so terrible at the same time. Get away from that director.

Chen Zhen
07-11-2006, 08:49 PM
other than the (UNBELEIVABLE!!!) action scenes, probably one of the worst movies I've ever seen.

i'd love to disagree with u, but i really cant...i dont think i could ever sit down and watch the whole film again without my remote in hand..

limubai2000
07-11-2006, 11:52 PM
I think after viewing it a few times (I have no clue how I managed that) I can say "where's my elephants?!" in fluent Thai. :p

Markgway
07-12-2006, 01:01 AM
Edited version, huh?

OK, hands up anyone here who's suprised?

Anyone... anyone... Bueller...??

beardy82
07-12-2006, 03:22 AM
I enjoyed it all the way through. U guys are just picky :)

Liu chung liang
07-12-2006, 07:51 AM
:lol ok people.... dissing TYG all the time lol.
remember that it is a "martial art action film"... so that's what we get.... a lot of "action" :smokin .
too much dialogue, less action, and we get demolition man. :lol

for the US... they're going to call it "THE PROTECTOR"....
One of Jackie's US movie used that title. They could just call it "The Elephant Boxer" or something like that. I dunno... how about "Restaurant of Dead Animals" lol.

chen lung
07-12-2006, 01:24 PM
Well, let's hope the cuts are reinstated for the DVD, otherwise they'll never earn their respect.

I smell rap/hiphop/Luc Besson-investation for an 'international' (French no doubt) version:( .

The Running Man
07-12-2006, 01:34 PM
Don't know about Luc Besson being invloved for TYG, but there is French hip hop in the version released in France.

chen lung
07-12-2006, 02:28 PM
It's also possible this movie would have been rescored too...

Liu chung liang
07-22-2006, 09:27 AM
Wow, the official US poster doesn't look too bad.

http://www.tonyjaa.org/gallery/albums/myupload/Movies/tyg/posters/normal_PROTECTOR_FINAL1.jpg

Finally, here is the Trailer to the US Version:
www.movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=2077000 (http://www.movies.msn.com/movies/movie.aspx?m=2077000)

They make it look so exciting.

Tosh
07-22-2006, 10:04 AM
The Protector, is that not the dumbest rename they could come up with, just what the f is he suppose to be protecting? He failed to protect his elephant in the first 10 minutes of the movie.:\

chen lung
07-22-2006, 12:42 PM
Think that poster is a head-pasted job.

But yeah, it ain't bad:p .

Chen Zhen
07-22-2006, 03:26 PM
is it safe to assume itll be redubbed too? its cut, most likely rescored, and retitled...3/3 on the weinstein hack job list...just need to redub it to bring it home |I

Senor Quack
07-22-2006, 06:43 PM
The trailer says "featuring original music by the RZA". I'd say that's sure bet it's been rescored. Ugh! I'm saying hip hop is a bad thing, I just wish they'd quit re-scoring these films.

chen lung
07-22-2006, 06:48 PM
Contacted Bey Logan about this and if the DVD will be safe.

VenomsFan
07-23-2006, 08:17 AM
what the f is he suppose to be protecting? He failed to protect his elephant in the first 10 minutes of the movie

LOL. He doesn't protect the elephant in the last 10 min either. Will be good to see it on the big screen anyways. But I wonder which RZA they are talking about. Becasue there were 2 different RZA's for the Danny the Dog/Unleashed film. Remember the confusion? One was the hip hop producer, the other was white female the UK singer/composer. They coudn't even get it straight in the many DVD releases to follow.

chen lung
07-23-2006, 02:24 PM
OK, received response from Bey:

"Our TYG AKA The Protector is our unique cut, and has been approved by Prachya and Tony Jaa. We don't have firm specs for the DVD yet, but I certainly want to get the original on there."

Yi Long
07-23-2006, 03:27 PM
Ahhh... a cut version again. great. Thanks Bey! Job well done(!) Awesome(!)

Ah well... I'll be going for a bootleg version then I guess, unless Premier Asia DOES give it an uncut/un****ed release.

I wish people like Harvey and Bey would just fall of a cliff and die...

chen lung
07-23-2006, 03:29 PM
Ahhh... a cut version again. great. Thanks Bey! Job well done(!) Awesome(!)
DVD is yet to come out so let's just see...

Yi Long
07-23-2006, 03:32 PM
You think they'll go through all the trouble of cutting the movie and re-editing it, and inserting a new soundtrack... and then suddenly they'll release an uncut version on DVD!?

I seriously doubt it.

The Running Man
07-24-2006, 09:18 PM
What's funny about the retitling of "The Protector" is that it has nothing to do with the movie. He isn't protecting anybody! In fact, his elephant in the movie was stolen from him and in the entire thing he is trying to find it and get it back. I don't believe that counts as any sort of protection. And as far as human beings go, he is killing almost every person he sees in that movie left and right.

Seems to me Harvey is real hell bent on making a "The Asian-er Box Set" in the future along with "The Defender" and "The Enforcer".

No doubt that puppet Bey Logan is totally supporting this and will claim, "It sells better! Really it does! I know that cause my monthly check arrives next week!" Damn sell out...

Yi Long
07-24-2006, 10:41 PM
Yeah, I'm sure Bey isnt minding this one bit. He is actually in a position to make things better, and we STILL have @#%$ like this going on. What a wanker.

limubai2000
07-24-2006, 11:22 PM
While I do agree Bey is starting to seem like a sell out its possible he can influence the process more directly in the future. It might be entirely possible that they are giving him limited control until he proves that he can acquire and market films that will make money. This would be normal in the movie biz aka paying your dues. As for the cuts I'm going to point fingers at Harvey. Though in truth the film could use tightening just like Ong Bak did.

And yes it seems likely that they would put the cut and uncut versions on the DVD, look at their specs on the SPL/Kill Zone DVD... they are better than the HK one!!! And you can bet who is responsible for that, Bey probably is. So I will lament the theatrical release of a cut version (though it might be tighter than the uncut version just like Ong Bak was) but will go see it if available in my area coz it probably looks awesome on the big screen, and will wait for the DVD I would assume to drop in November for Xmas season.

Yi Long
07-24-2006, 11:44 PM
I dont know. Bey has always been pro-cuts. It's evident in his book as well as some of his commentary. He feels these asian movies need cuts and trimming etc to appeal to the western market. Which is bullshit, as those people narrow-minded enough to not being able to accept anything that isnt 'westernised', isnt your target area. Or at least it shouldnt be. Plus most of the youth HATES dubs and wants to see their anime and movies UNCUT.

Obviously Harvey is also much to blame, but we all expected this from him anyway. the guy is a major league @#%$ who doesnt know @#%$ about movies. How many cut asian movies have actually improved on the original version?

Bey is held to high esteem by many here, and I agree he does interesting commentaries... and his book is quite nice.... but his views on movies and moviemaking are just way off.

Sad thing is he actually seems to have lots of influence in HK cinema at the moment, which has very often resulted in him helping out with the casting of certain movies, and sees him choosing teenybop singers over actual actors/martial artists. And obviously is acting and screenwriting is horrible as well.

We just want our movies uncut and subbed, in it's original soundtrack and ratio. Is that really so hard to understand for these movie people!?

Cant there be a law or something that says works of art, including movies, are not allowed to be cut by anyone other then the director? Or at least not by some company who just buys the rights for a certain area?

BTW, I dont like Bey Logan's name, so from now on he will be known a B-Lo. I think that connects more with us young people.

The Running Man
07-25-2006, 12:07 AM
While I do agree Bey is starting to seem like a sell out its possible he can influence the process more directly in the future

I don't know what you mean by "starting to" when he has pretty much made it very clear on where he stands for almost at least two years now on his audio commentaries.

I posted this on another board some time ago...I'll put it here as well:

BTW, seeing as how James decided to quote Brian White, I decided to take it upon myself and also quote Bey Logan and Mike Leeder on their stance seeing as how some have been, I suppose, in denial that Bey would actually feel the way he does on this since they keep defending him or just plain ignoring it.

So, this is directly taken from the HKL commentary track of First Option. This is word for word what was said:

Bey Logan: I remember, Media Asia actually, we got into a lot of trouble cause we redid the sound on some of the early DVDs like A Better Tomorrow.

Mike Leeder: Yeah, you got rid of the music man! That's the best pa...

B: That was right! And what do they get stuck with? "Media Evil" that's right...

M: That's like...."MiraAXE"

B: Yeah yeah....now they got the thing on Mira...wha what's your take on that?

M: My take is...okay...most Hong Kong films were shot without any sound. So dubbing them into any language doesn't really harm them. If it gets the films to a bigger audience...great. Miramax will release them and yes they might trim them but, you know what? They also pushed Iron Monkey onto the charts...

B: Yeah.

M: They were the guys who released Legend of the Drunken Master...Drunken Master 2. A lot of movies that would have otherwise never have got seen. And yes...I'm a big fanboy myself but, you got to give it a break. It is a case of....otherwise the only people who are gonna be making money of it are the pirates.

B: Yeah.

M: And it's now good to see these movies getting a proper release.

B: Right. I feel the same. And I think if you just spent a lot of money....it's like if I buy you a house for millions and millions of dollars and I paint it green...I've paid for the privilege of painting it green.


Yup...and green is also the color of money isn't it Bey?

GwaiLoMoFo
07-25-2006, 03:54 AM
This cracks me up!! Sooo many people complained about how terrible this film was apart from the action scenes. If anything some of you guys should be ecstatic that they are cutting it up. Cause you know they wont be touching any of the action. Some of you will probably like the movie more!!:lol ;)

chen lung
07-25-2006, 07:57 AM
SPL will be the original version AFAIK.

The Running Man
07-25-2006, 09:11 AM
This cracks me up!! Sooo many people complained about how terrible this film was apart from the action scenes. If anything some of you guys should be ecstatic that they are cutting it up. Cause you know they wont be touching any of the action. Some of you will probably like the movie more!!

Yeah, pretty much anyone who's already seen Tom Yum Goong is not really complaning about the movie being cut, since it's so horrible outside of the action.

I'm actually interested to see what they are gonna do with it, since the movie itself it so damn unwatchable I would love to know how they are going to make it anywhere near watchable.

Probably just cut as much as they possibly can out.

Yi Long
07-25-2006, 03:11 PM
... Like these movies he speaks of, Fist of Legend, Drunken Master 2, Iron Monkey... like they wouldnt have been succesfull if they had been released UNCUT and subbed. Give me a @#%$ break, Bey. These movies are a success DESPITE of the horrible treatment they have gotten by Miramax. Not BECAUSE of...

Besides... if Miramax are doing such a fine job, why are all the fans BOYCOTTING their poor, cut releases? I wouldnt even watch their FOL or DM2 if it was free, let alone buy it.

He says otherwise pirates would be the only ones making money out of it... Guess what? I'm very much NOT into pirating, but I'll gladly pay a pirate for FOL uncut and subbed, instead of paying money to Miramax for their release.
IF Miramaxe would just release these movies uncut and subbed, pirates wouldnt be making any money as there would be no reason for us to resort to bootlegs.

Bey Logan is such a @#%$.
He actually believes that Miramax is doing us all a favour... (!) Get the @#%$ outta here, Bey. Miramax has even made it impossible for CHINESE people to get the CHINESE version. How @#%$ arrogant is that!?

He calls himself a 'fanboy', but he is one of the reasons that HK cinema is in the sorry-ass state it's in. Dumb ****s like him shouldnt be in this business.

Remember all those Kurosawa classics that only got cut releases back in the 50's and 60's? It's now 50 years later, and though finally people have realised that nobody wants CUT Kurosawa's, the movie execs are still making those same mistakes.

Yi Long
07-26-2006, 12:35 AM
Ow yeah... the soundtrack for Warrior King (blegh) was done by RZA.
Where's a drive-by shooting when you need one?

VenomsFan
07-31-2006, 03:04 PM
Hey Yi Long I agree with you except

IF Miramaxe would just release these movies uncut and subbed, pirates wouldnt be making any money as there would be no reason for us to resort to bootlegs.

Not really. I mean official releases are released on DVD before they even get into Miramaxe's hands to release them in the US. Sure more people see them once going through the US market. But by that time There are several international versions on official DVD, not bootleg.

Bootlegger's I suppose could advertise better quality DVDs. But his has nothing to do with Miramaxe.

Are you sure it's hip hop RZA? Because there is a female RZA who worked on Danny the Dog (Baby Boy). There was some money making confusion on that US DVD release as well. Can anyone confirm it's the hip hop RZA? And not the vocal composer from UK RZA?

Johnnie freeze
08-02-2006, 11:32 AM
You think they'll go through all the trouble of cutting the movie and re-editing it, and inserting a new soundtrack... and then suddenly they'll release an uncut version on DVD!?

Umm... yeah, they might. Theatrical releases are edited to satisfy the *general* Western audiance as they don't want to lose them to too much Eastern culture and philosophy. They can satisfy us hardcore martial arts headz by offering the uncut footage on the dvd. They know *we* want to see it but we're a small minority compared to your casual western fan who's just looking to be entertained by a new Jackie Chan. They'd actually lose money at the theatre trying to satisy the hardcore MA fan rather then pleasing the masses. Unfortunately they don't offer 2 versions at the theatre-1 for the average joe and another for us, but they can do it on the DVD. It's all about marketing.

The Running Man
08-02-2006, 12:50 PM
They'd actually lose money at the theatre trying to satisy the hardcore MA fan rather then pleasing the masses

There's no proof of such.

limubai2000
08-03-2006, 12:38 AM
There's no proof of such.

Agreed. If anything the last 5, maybe 8(?) non-US big martial arts films that were "properly" promoted and released all made money at the US box office, even Hero which Miramax basically dumped made money for them. I don't recall any (HOFD, Hero, or CTHD) being edited save CTHD getting an Eng dub in some theaters, I saw all of them subtitled on the big screen. I believe all of Jet Li's films cut a profit as do Jackie Chan's I see no reason why TYG, OB, or SPL couldn't cut a decent profit if they were released at an appropriate time (ie not against a BIG blockbuster), properly promoted, and uncut except maybe adding an Eng dub.

I think if the morons who had Ong Bak would have really pimped that release they could have capped $100 million easily, it would have been perceived as "groundbreaking" in the US market. Especially since I show that DVD to non-MA folks and they are floored by the action in it, most of them go buy the DVD.

Johnnie freeze
08-03-2006, 02:31 AM
There's no proof of such.


Well..........right or wrong the bussinesmen who do the marketing of these flicks must feel there is proof of such which is partly why they re-edit and re-name movies with titles like "The Protector" and "Kill Zone". Its to make them more appealing and markatable to western audiances. I'm not saying that I like it, because I dont, but I understand business, and if there was "no proof", trust me, they sure wouldn't bother.

The Running Man
08-03-2006, 03:16 PM
The only proof that exists is that people like Harvey Weinstein do not respect most Asian cinema. They see it as a quick profit because he sees it as fast food. He does not see it as "real cinema". When asked about why he does this despite the far outcry from fans against his actions he was quoted as saying that he was doing it "to make the @#%$ work".

Gwailos Forever
08-03-2006, 03:35 PM
Everyone is entitled to their opinion here, but I personaly believe some of you should give Bey and Mike some slack.

Both these guys have done much more over the years promoting and raising the awareness of HK cinema to the Western World then all of us on this forum combined (if anyone here feels they have achieved greater things in this field please let me know)

I understand why people get passionate about cuts, hey, I've been annoyed myself on certain occasions being a long time fanboy myself. What I disagree with though are the very personal insults appearing here. Things like "I wish Bey would die", "He's a c**t" etc etc. It's just not appropriate

If Bey and Mike were trafficking women, dealing drugs etc then I'd understand

Chen Zhen
08-03-2006, 06:35 PM
I understand why people get passionate about cuts, hey, I've been annoyed myself on certain occasions being a long time fanboy myself. What I disagree with though are the very personal insults appearing here. Things like "I wish Bey would die", "He's a c**t" etc etc. It's just not appropriate

agree and cosign there....after all, these are just films, these guys arent starting pointless wars (ie bush). some of u guys really need to just relax...sounds like a few of u guys are losing sleep over this. not to mention, i thought a few of u WANTED the film to be cut since TYG, action aside, is just awful?

The Running Man
08-03-2006, 07:40 PM
Everyone is entitled to their opinion here, but I personaly believe some of you should give Bey and Mike some slack.

Slack on what? For being huge hypocrites? For Bey being a sell out and letting himself become a puppet? To be honest, not enough heat is being turned on these guys.

Both these guys have done much more over the years promoting and raising the awareness of HK cinema to the Western World then all of us on this forum combined (if anyone here feels they have achieved greater things in this field please let me know)

So by your logic...someone should work their way up so that they can sell out and become hypocrites. Because supporting the alterations on Asian films because certain white men in power don't like them is a bad thing. However, if you wrote articles on Asian moveis before, claimed you are a big fan, then do commentaries where you just talk a lot.....THEN you support the alterations on Asian films because certain white men in power don't like them....people will understand you.

I'm sorry but this has no logic to it other than just defending Bey Logan and Mike Leeder just cause they are Bey Logan and Mike Leeder. Let's be honest here, that's what this is all about really. Anyone else would have done or said what they did people would have no problem rambling on them as they have on Harvey himself. But because it's Bey Logan and Mike Leeder saying it, some people actually give it thought as if they might have a point or something.

Get real guys...

chen lung
08-03-2006, 07:45 PM
Yeah, few comments best avoided despite the differences.

I've received word that there was no time for Donnie commentary, HK press footage was poor quality but Wu Jing demo should still be happening (subject to change).

Johnnie freeze
08-03-2006, 08:19 PM
When asked about why he does this despite the far outcry from fans against his actions he was quoted as saying that he was doing it "to make the @#%$ work".


This qoute proves my point.
American studios dont feel that most Asian movies would work with a western audiance without some "tweaking". Raymond Chow was responsible for cutting out plenty of "Way Of The Dragon" for its US release, feeling that the humor [which had people rolling in the ailes in Asia] just "wouldn't work" in the US. I dont believe a lack of respect is the driving force for these changes....its more because of the cultural differences between east and west. If they are guilty of anything, it is narrow mindedness. Narrow minded studios simply pleasing your average narrow minded movie goer. Just be happy if they give the option of the original untampered with movie on the DVD.
Here is a link about the deal with Jet Li/Jackie Chan project
www.editzplanet.com/modul...umpost1427 (http://www.editzplanet.com/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?forum=23&post_id=1427#forumpost1427)

if you cant view its basically saying
"It will be more American-style. It will be more suited to foreign audiences than Chinese audiences," he said. "If you make a Hollywood movie, of course you have to follow their wishes. They're paying us so much money."

This goes to show that movies are geared towards certain audiances, and that holds true whether they're making it, or re-editing it.
A thousand years from now the whole world will be united and 1 family....no more edited foreign movies for the other people. Be patient if you live that long.:smokin
* for the record, I dont like my movies edited...so if it can be proven that just as many westerners if not more would pay to see these movies untouched, then I'm sure they would stop. [right? >D ]

The Running Man
08-03-2006, 10:26 PM
American studios dont feel that most Asian movies would work with a western audiance without some "tweaking". Raymond Chow was responsible for cutting out plenty of "Way Of The Dragon" for its US release, feeling that the humor [which had people rolling in the ailes in Asia] just "wouldn't work" in the US.

Raymond Chow was spineless. The man was so desperate for success in the West that anything that seemed possible for that success he would do. For proof, know that he approved Robert Clouse's Game of Death '78 and all it's tasteless glory (gotta love that footage of Bruce's real funeral to act as a fake funeral in the film).

I dont believe a lack of respect is the driving force for these changes....its more because of the cultural differences between east and west. If they are guilty of anything, it is narrow mindedness. Narrow minded studios simply pleasing your average narrow minded movie goer.

Well, narrow mindedness is on the same track for lack of respect. Anyone that describes these films as "sh!t" and that they need to be made to work is saying something on how they view these films. I remember someone passing along an interview with Harvey where he said that Jackie Chan's films for him are "guilty pleasures". That's not a compliment.

Of course, every now and then there are moments where things are understandable. TYG is a horrible movie and quite honestly unfit for theatrical release. Heavy editing on that wouldn't surprise me. However it's not this occasion that is being looked at...it's the whole picture.

Yi Long
08-03-2006, 11:55 PM
I'm not taking ANYTHING back about what I said about Bey and Mike.

You say I shouldnt be so critical and negative about them cause they've done so much for asian movie fans in the west?

I partly agree that they've done alot to promote asian movies. Bey's commentaries are often entertaining and informative, and Mike has done a good job at HKL, hence some stuff that could/should have been better. Bey also wrote a nice book which I've enjoyed reading many many times. So I give them credit for that. Bey also did some nice stuff for TV, plus ofcourse the interviews and docu's on the HKL discs are nice as well.

But when it come sto them messing around with these movies, as in ALTERING/CUTTING them. That just wont fly, man. There's no excuse.

When asked about why he does this despite the far outcry from fans against his actions he was quoted as saying that he was doing it "to make the @#%$ work".

So suddenly Bey knows what WOULD work!? Can anyone give me the name of a movie, which Bey was involved in (creatively) that's been good? I cant think of any. Most of the movies he had a say in, are complete and utter CRAP. And most of them seem to rely on popstars to sell the flick to the local audience, which has been one of the main problems in HK cinema for the last 10 years orso.

So Bey know NOTHING about what makes a good movie. NOTHING!
But suddenly he has the power to change GOOD movies?

NOBODY can tell me that Fist of Legend, in it's original version, would NOT be a success. Instead of wasting all that money on cuts, dubs and edits etc etc... they should just do some proper subs on it, and use the rest of the money for some proper marketing, and FOL would sell ALOT of copies.

Ow... and get a decent cover designer, instead of usual 15 year old photoshop-copy-paste-floating-head-on-wrong-body kid.

Drunken Master 2 is PERFECT. Doesnt need ANY change. NONE at all. FOL same thing.

But even when a movie isnt perfect, they shouldnt cut it anyway. Cuts have pretty much NEVER made a movie better. Plus the fanbase wont buy the cut version.

Bey should just keep doing the things he's good at, such as commentaries and interviews...
Mike, I have no clue what he does, but he sure as hell shouldnt be altering soundtracks.

I fear the very worst for these movies they'll be releasing.

It's very simple what we ask for: Uncut, subbed movies. Personally I dont even need extras or a dub or whatever... I just want these movies uncut and subbed in a good quality, just so I can enjoy the movie.
Why do they keep thinking they should 'alter' it for the western market? All us fanboys are western.
If some hillbilly doesnt like the movie in it's original cut, you really think he'd suddenly like it once it's cut and dubbed?
Maybe.... but we should market these movies at low-brow hillbillies, but just at normal guys like us and our friends.
I've had many many friends who werent into asian cinema, who watched a HK movie (uncut and subbed) and absolutely loved it.

Fact is, a good movie is universal. There's no 'east' and 'west' @#%$. A good movie is a good movie. And a bad movie is a bad movie. It's very simple. Some western people will frown on wuxia movies with the flying and magic crap, but so do many asian people! There's nothing wrong with a movie not being liked by EVERYONE. Cutting 20 minutes from Bride with White Hair wont suddenly change a person's mind about liking it or not liking it. He/she would still dislike the flying magic stuff.

So in short: yeah I still think Bey and Mike are dicks. I'm sure they're nice persons in real life, and I'm sure they feel they are doing the right thing... but they are DICKS when it comes to them cutting/altering movies.

I'm guessing it's also partly insecurity. You have a good movie, you are going to release it, but you're not sure if everyone will like it. You feel it might not be good in some parts, and you feel you have to do SOMETHING to make sure it will be a success... so you start thinking... hmmm... maybe it's better if we cut out that part I didnt like...

But it isnt.

Just sub it, clean up the Video-quality, burn it on a DVD, and @#%$ release it. use the money you save from not having to cut, edit, dub, etc etc... and use that for some proper marketing. And you'll please the big big BIG fanbase, AND you'll reach the mainsteam audience.

It's so simple. Why the @#%$ dont they just do it RIGHT?

limubai2000
08-04-2006, 02:50 AM
Arguing on a message board is like 2 people trying to kill each with wiffle bats...

:p

Isfahani
08-04-2006, 04:28 AM
You know, as long as they end up killing each other that's all that counts. :lol

I haven't paid much attention to this whole issue, we all know where to go to get the real goods - and if these chopjobs get the attention of the average american dumb**** moviegoer, then great... They're used to being spoonfed crap.

Cynical? Yeppers...

Just sub it, clean up the Video-quality, burn it on a DVD, and @#%$ release it. use the money you save from not having to cut, edit, dub, etc etc... and use that for some proper marketing. And you'll please the big big BIG fanbase, AND you'll reach the mainsteam audience.
Hey, no argument there, in a semi-perfect world... but @#%$, why try and force logic on a system that's known to be hopelessly illogical, and has been from the start?

Yi Long
08-04-2006, 10:15 AM
Arguing on a message board is like 2 people trying to kill each with wiffle bats... :b

Nah... I'd just jam the wiffle bat down his throut. That should kill him. If it doesnt I'll ram it up some other hole... ;)

The Running Man
08-04-2006, 12:47 PM
Hey Yi Long,
That second quote you replied to (to make the sh!t work) was Harvey Weinstien who said it. Not Bey Logan. :)

Johnnie freeze
08-04-2006, 12:54 PM
Raymond Chow was spineless. The man was so desperate for success in the West that anything that seemed possible for that success he would do. For proof, know that he approved Robert Clouse's Game of Death '78 and all it's tasteless glory (gotta love that footage of Bruce's real funeral to act as a fake funeral in the film).

I totally agree. G.O.D. '78' was disgusting, but you said it yourself "Raymond Chow -was so desperate for success in the West that anything that seemed possible for that success he would do". What he did [as tasteless as it is] was to Well, narrow mindedness is on the same track for lack of respect.


<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Well, narrow mindedness is on the same track for lack of respect. Anyone that describes these films as "sh!t" and that they need to be made to work is saying something on how they view these films. I remember someone passing along an interview with Harvey where he said that Jackie Chan's films for him are "guilty pleasures". That's not a com<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->

I agree, to a point...calling someone esle's work
"sh!t" is very disrespectful, but I dont agree that narrow mindedness is necessarily disrespect. It is mainly ignorance, which can lead to disrespect, but doesnt have to be.
Then there is the new Jet Li/ jackie Chan project....are they being disrespectful for making a movie thats geared towards westerners rather than the eastern audiance? Maybe the right thing would be to make a movie that appeals to both.
Whether its making a new flick or editing an old one, It's all about the money.;)

Yi Long
08-04-2006, 02:17 PM
Hey Yi Long,
That second quote you replied to (to make the sh!t work) was Harvey Weinstien who said it. Not Bey Logan.

Ow oki... I stand corrected. (Slaps head in shame...:o )
Anyway, it seems like Bey feels the same way about it, as in that these movies need changing so they would better suit the western market, so I stand by my earlier statement that Bey shouldnt even go near a movie if he thinks he can improve it by editing/cutting/altering it.

He should just keep doing good commentaries and maybe write a new book or something. Although if he would write a new book, he'd have to adress the post 94 slump HK cinema is in, and he and people like him, are part of the reason that slump is there...

Gwailos Forever
08-04-2006, 02:23 PM
Running Man, Yi Long,

I honestly respect your opinions, and I understand where you're coming from. I really do.

The ONLY thing I have issue with is the very persoanl nasty remarks aimed at them such as "Bey is a c**t, I wish Bey would die" etc etc

I just find that distasteful and inappropiate. Venting frustrations and what you think they are doing wrong I have no problem with, wishing them to die etc because of it, I do find too much

GwaiLoMoFo
08-05-2006, 02:43 AM
because certain white men in power don't like them
I too blame the "white men in power" for all the wrongs of the world (At least thats what Homey The Clown taught us). Down wit da man!! :lol

killer meteor
08-05-2006, 08:13 AM
"For proof, know that he approved Robert Clouse's Game of Death '78 and all it's tasteless glory (gotta love that footage of Bruce's real funeral to act as a fake funeral in the film)."

You know, I watched GOD because I heard of its tastelessness and subsequently became a HK movie fan. And that scene is awful, what with Gig Young grinning like a loon and promising us "a very believeable funeral", and is it me or does the crowd scream when they open the coffin. At least in Bruce Lee The Man The Myth and Exit The Dragon, Enter The Tiger it was the real funeral and given a modicum of dignity - a very small modicum, mind you.

I don't see why Chow didn't make a bio-pic of his own, perhaps casting an up and coming like Yuen Biao, than including the GOD sequence as the finale, like what they did with Warrior's Journey.

chen lung
08-05-2006, 11:02 AM
How about the retarded war-cries? Got about 20 of them on my HD for fun;) !

Indeed James, it'll be "VERY believable"0] .:rollin (no disrespect or anything).

What's the Thai equivilent for a 'Gwailo'? Think theres a few in that film 'TYG', and bad ones too! All those muscle men are brawn and no brain:lol !

Tosh
08-05-2006, 11:43 AM
What's the Thai equivilent for a 'Gwailo'?

Sawatdee(Hello), The evil white man would be called - Farangs:lol

fabhui
08-05-2006, 01:15 PM
The Thai word 'Farang' does not have the same kind of negative undertones as Gwailo though!

jfinesse2000
09-09-2006, 12:19 PM
Well, this was my first Tony Jaa experience. I have been watching Kung Fu movies for many years, I have been posting on this forum for a few. I haven't seen Ong Bak or the original version of The Protector.
I went to the matinee on Friday and I wanted to walk out after the first 20 minutes or so, but I stuck it out. From the point around when that scene in the restaurant where it's all done in one shot/take, my opinion of the movie changed a little.
Jaa is a maniac. He seems a little like Jackie. In fact, parts of the movie reminded me of Rumble in the Bronx for some reason. And I know it's not kung fu, but I could have done with a little less arm-breaking. That got kind of tedious. Like how many ways can he break someones arm?

As for the soundtrack/score. Anyone worrying about the hip-hop in it. I think there were 2 or 3 hip-hop tracks in it. None of them had anything to do with the RZA. He along with another guy whose name I don't remember did an orchestral score.

And Venomsfan, there is no female RZA. If you look at the credits for Unleashed, that song Baby Boy was produced by the RZA with vocals by Thea.

Oh well, my 2 cents.

HAZ74
09-09-2006, 01:21 PM
Hi,

I think the title "The Protector" come from the fact that Tony Jaa's family in the movie comes from a long line of soldiers who's job it is to protect the elephant's legs from attack when the king is riding it.

peace

h

gfanikf
09-10-2006, 04:56 AM
I have to say that I agree with everyone about the bizzare edits and weird films prints. However, I really didnt feels the fights were cut much (weird pans aside though) at least enought to bother me (I think the leg break maybe because of the MPAA I know why did all the other stuff get left in but hey its the MPAA). So many weird plot cuts and stuff made the film feel like it was on Meth (which in a way was a nice plus) but I never liked the Thai Directors cut of the human drama (besides the action with the elephent) so it didn't bother me as much but I can see how it can easily bother people.

HOWEVER that said, I saw the second coming of Bruce Lee and Jackie Chan tonight. I was at a 75% full showing at 10:45 in Downtown Philadelphia and people were in love with the both cheering for Tony, groaning at a bone crunch, going OMFG when TK first appeared and his three henchman and also during stunts and going nuts during certain moves during the orgy of the broken (TM). I have a feeling that Tony Jaa is going to start getting over very big in this country (Ong Bak laid the groundwork). I happy it was able to get in to theatres (alot more than Ong Bak ever could) even in this format as it exposed a lot of people to TJ and its only going to help in the future. Say what you will about TWC but they have the clout to get stuff in to a lot of theatres when they want to. That said Dragon Dynasty should definatly put both cuts of the film on the DVD because I have a feeling both will have there fans and it just makes sense in this day and age and there is no reason why not too.

So trust me go out and see the flick you may laugh at the edits and such but man will the action ensure you dont feel jipped at all. Don't miss this great expereince and bring some friends too.

tigerstyles
09-10-2006, 08:15 AM
pity they did'nt edit the Capero fight better and have him getting up from his beating then going over to Nathan Jones to ask for a hand as he does in the deleted scenes..

a choppy film chopped more.. no loss just another version to watch..

gfanikf
09-10-2006, 04:58 PM
tigerstyles

Nice way to sum it up. However where are these deleted scenes on (Thai or Korean disc?). Actually I disagree with you as I think the sudden appearance of TK works much better and people where really going nuts when they first saw him appear.

gfanikf
09-10-2006, 05:10 PM
As a result of a good practice LSAT score. Jess agreed to go see it again with me (she's such a doll) and I can't wait to see it again.

From Boxoffice mojo
boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/ (http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/)

4 N The Protector Wein. $5,032,000 - 1,541 - $3,265 $5,032,000 - 1

Not as bad as it seems as it has the high per theatre average plus it seems to be getting good word of mouth coupled with the fact it is only in half the theatres as the no1 (plus I doubt this cost TWC a lot of money to put out). Hell it as already suprassed Ong Bak's ENTIRE Release in the US.

tigerstyles
09-10-2006, 07:43 PM
Hi

Korean DVD had a hour making of on it which was worth the price of the DVD itself never seen it before and it contains ALOT of missing fight footage from the Thai release... inc all the extra before his first fight in the offices