kungfusamurai
07-01-2008, 06:20 PM
Before I get into discussing this movie, I have to warn that I have to talk about the ending(s), so if you haven't watched it yet, and don't want the ending spoiled, don't read this thread! :)
I finally watched this movie after years of hearing about it. I remember the good reviews about it when it was in the theatre, so when it came on TV a few weeks ago, I watched it. I missed the first parts when he was a kid, so I rented the infinifilm DVD. Much to my surprise (or disappointment), the movie was different from what I saw on TV!
The TV version, which I'm thinking now was the theatrical version, ends with Kutcher's character sometime in the future walking on a busy city street. He sees Amy Smart's character, Kaleigh, but because he's changed the timeline, she's never known him, or something like that. He walks up and then past her and they go their separate ways, and that's the end.
Watching the DVD, the ending was different. It has him in the doctors office, he starts watching his dad's home movies, uses that to transport himself into the past where he kills himself in the womb. When I first saw this, I thought it was dumb. I preferred the theatrical version better.
But now I'm thinking about the movie. I read some write-ups on it, and I'm thinking that the movie isn't a time travel movie at all. It's actually about Kutcher's character being locked up in a mental institution and he's retreated into his own little fantasy world, coming up with alternate lives had his friend Kaleigh not been killed by the explosive. With himself going back and killing himself in the womb, I wonder if that meant he either really dies in the office, or he completely removes himself from reality, hopefully absolving himself and the bad thing he did as a child?
Anyway, that's my take on that directors cut. I still have the DVD, so I will need to play the audio commentary. Hopefully it'll give more information on what the directors were thinking.
Lastly, I think Kutcher was okay, but just because he wasn't doing his That 70s Shows type of character didn't really mean he did a great job in this film. I've seen it twice now, and I feel that he was a little too wooden. There were good dramatic moments, like when he kills Kaleigh's brother in one of the timelines, but overall, it probably would have been better had they had another actor in the role.
Any thoughts on this film?
KFS
I finally watched this movie after years of hearing about it. I remember the good reviews about it when it was in the theatre, so when it came on TV a few weeks ago, I watched it. I missed the first parts when he was a kid, so I rented the infinifilm DVD. Much to my surprise (or disappointment), the movie was different from what I saw on TV!
The TV version, which I'm thinking now was the theatrical version, ends with Kutcher's character sometime in the future walking on a busy city street. He sees Amy Smart's character, Kaleigh, but because he's changed the timeline, she's never known him, or something like that. He walks up and then past her and they go their separate ways, and that's the end.
Watching the DVD, the ending was different. It has him in the doctors office, he starts watching his dad's home movies, uses that to transport himself into the past where he kills himself in the womb. When I first saw this, I thought it was dumb. I preferred the theatrical version better.
But now I'm thinking about the movie. I read some write-ups on it, and I'm thinking that the movie isn't a time travel movie at all. It's actually about Kutcher's character being locked up in a mental institution and he's retreated into his own little fantasy world, coming up with alternate lives had his friend Kaleigh not been killed by the explosive. With himself going back and killing himself in the womb, I wonder if that meant he either really dies in the office, or he completely removes himself from reality, hopefully absolving himself and the bad thing he did as a child?
Anyway, that's my take on that directors cut. I still have the DVD, so I will need to play the audio commentary. Hopefully it'll give more information on what the directors were thinking.
Lastly, I think Kutcher was okay, but just because he wasn't doing his That 70s Shows type of character didn't really mean he did a great job in this film. I've seen it twice now, and I feel that he was a little too wooden. There were good dramatic moments, like when he kills Kaleigh's brother in one of the timelines, but overall, it probably would have been better had they had another actor in the role.
Any thoughts on this film?
KFS