Go Back   Kung Fu Cinema Forums > General Discussion


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump
Old 08-01-2009, 06:21 PM   #1
The Silver Fox
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 202
Default DVD-R = Bootleg?

Seeing how the PanMedia issue is being discussed I figured it would be relevant to discuss DVD-R's and how they figure into things.

Okay,so the consensus seems to be that buying from bootleg distributors like VideoAsia,PanMedia etc. is wrong/ immoral/a bad thing to do/ etc. Okay fine. My question is if that is wrong, how can making a DVD-R of a commercial release and then selling or trading it be okay?

The reason I ask is because to me it's the same thing. You would think there would be a somewhat uniform consistency but I submit that alot of us in Kung Fu fandom suscribe to a morality of convenience. Some here rail on the evils of bootleg distributors yet wouldn't think twice about buying/selling/trading DVD-Rs.

Curious as to what others think.
The Silver Fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 07:19 PM   #2
Blood Sword
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 239
Default

This is issue I have been thinking a lot and will do again in future.Buying bootlegs is bad but if doing so encourages shop to take into shelf legal releases it`s not all that bad.Downloading is best choice but not all items are available and not every1 wants to mess up with torrents meincluded...trading also if you make dvdr of copyrighted film a la ivl,golden harvest etc..and exchange it to film you are after not good either...
Buying legal release is best way to support industry which has small amount of customers and if legal not available then get it by other way...
Blood Sword is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 07:27 PM   #3
littlefuzzy
Member
 
littlefuzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 154
Default

My opinion, for what it's worth, is this:

First of all, from what I understand, many of the bootleg operations are funnelling money into Triads or other organized crime, including drug organizations. I really don't know if that applies to the bootleg MA dvds or not.

Second, if something IS readily available in the US (or whatever your country of origin is,) OR is readily available as a legitimate import, then it shouldn't be bootlegged. However, say something was released on a small run of VCD or DVDs 5-10 years ago (or even VHS even further back,) the publisher isn't making it any more, and it's hard to find... I have no problem with a fan in the community sharing that with other fans, either by trading, or even selling it for a nominal fee (say $5 or so to cover the cost of the disc and shipping.)

If someone had, say, the "ultimate edition" of Drunken Master with the uncut original audio, and accurate subs, I would love to get that. I've already bought the US disc, and I doubt I'll double dip with an import, as all the other versions appear to have various problems as well.

I have been aware of bootlegs in the Anime community for many years. Again, if it is something released in the US, then commercial bootlegs are bad. However, if it hasn't been licensed in the US, fan subs are great (preferrably as free downloads from usenet or torrents.)

For that matter, certain bootlegs of titles still under copyright in the US wold be acceptable to me, if there is no sign of a legitimate release ever coming - Song of the South, Porgy & Bess (with the musical numbers intact,) and so on. Still, I'd prefer not to support a bootleg company that may be tied to organized crime.
littlefuzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 07:58 PM   #4
Fightingfist
Senior Member
 
Fightingfist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 541
Send a message via MSN to Fightingfist
Default

Bootlegs not that good.
Fightingfist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 11:09 PM   #5
lillippa328
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 669
Default

Way i see it is like this.......



I personally believe all these "bootleg" companies give the rightful owner a cut...other wise they would be stopped by now dont you think? I think they make more money buy letting the bootleggers mass produce it for them for cheaper, and they get a cut, and simultanteously release the legal versions here and there....for obvious reasons...


also...does Shaw even see money if I purchase a Celestial? I dont even think they do, and i know for a fact LKL and GL ect... dont......


and have this shit you cant find


i prefer the real versions but ill take what I find
lillippa328 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 11:29 PM   #6
Morgoth
Master
 
Morgoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,252
Default

No company partners with Red Sun/Bonzai/Panmedia, and they don't get any cut. At least no company like Image, Dragon Dynasty, Media Blasters, Well Go USA… It just doesn’t make any sense. Red Sun/ DVDs don’t play a lot of the time, or they play, but then stop playing after a month or 2. Not all of them do that, but I have at least 10 Red Sun DVDs that I had to throw away because they don’t play anymore. Also when the pirate copies these movies, a lot of the time he messes up the transfer and the picture quality isn’t nearly as good as the original release (Executioners, 3 Evils...). Also, the audio is horrible on at least half of my Red Sun DVDs. I could go on and on with these problems, and no legit company would allow these types of problems on their DVDs, at least not consistently like Red Sun does. Trust me they get no cut. No legit company would be associated with Red Sun. After I found out Red Sun was a boot company, I decided to not support them anymore, but I figured that if I wanted an English dub, then it would be ok to buy from them. But then that really bit me in the ass and every DVD I bought from them had audio problems. The English dub on Brave Archer 2 is completely inaudible.

I agree with fuzzy, the only bootlegging or DVDR trading that should be done is on movies that are rare and don’t have a DVD release or are out of print. If you want to keep buying these crappy DVDs and and let Red Sun hurt the chances for legit releases, then go ahead.

Also, if you have any legit Shaw releases, then it is a print from Celestial. SB got their money. No need to worry about that.
__________________
.


"When all this is over, Tan Hai Chi, I will kick your head off and put it on my brother's grave!"

Last edited by Morgoth; 08-01-2009 at 11:41 PM.
Morgoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 11:35 PM   #7
nectarsis
Member
 
nectarsis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lodi, Wisconsin
Posts: 61
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by littlefuzzy View Post
My opinion, for what it's worth, is this:

First of all, from what I understand, many of the bootleg operations are funnelling money into Triads or other organized crime, including drug organizations. I really don't know if that applies to the bootleg MA dvds or not.

Second, if something IS readily available in the US (or whatever your country of origin is,) OR is readily available as a legitimate import, then it shouldn't be bootlegged. However, say something was released on a small run of VCD or DVDs 5-10 years ago (or even VHS even further back,) the publisher isn't making it any more, and it's hard to find... I have no problem with a fan in the community sharing that with other fans, either by trading, or even selling it for a nominal fee (say $5 or so to cover the cost of the disc and shipping.)

If someone had, say, the "ultimate edition" of Drunken Master with the uncut original audio, and accurate subs, I would love to get that. I've already bought the US disc, and I doubt I'll double dip with an import, as all the other versions appear to have various problems as well.

I have been aware of bootlegs in the Anime community for many years. Again, if it is something released in the US, then commercial bootlegs are bad. However, if it hasn't been licensed in the US, fan subs are great (preferrably as free downloads from usenet or torrents.)

For that matter, certain bootlegs of titles still under copyright in the US wold be acceptable to me, if there is no sign of a legitimate release ever coming - Song of the South, Porgy & Bess (with the musical numbers intact,) and so on. Still, I'd prefer not to support a bootleg company that may be tied to organized crime.
Yet many of the movies were originally financed/produced/directed/etc. by triads ;)

Just sayin lol
nectarsis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 01:35 AM   #8
Killer Meteor
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 842
Default

I doubt most bootlegs are connected with traids or terrorists

As I say time and time again, the problem with Panmedia is that they sold their goods in legit stores, thus cutting into the market for legit dvds. Some goon in a car boot sale, or trading online, is not an issue for the legit companies.

And talking of DVD-Rs, Warners is now releasing some of its back catalogue on DVD-R only at extortionate prices
Killer Meteor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 03:58 AM   #9
kungfusamurai
Senior Member
 
kungfusamurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Killer Meteor View Post
And talking of DVD-Rs, Warners is now releasing some of its back catalogue on DVD-R only at extortionate prices
I remember hearing somewhere about them offering movies from their vaults as a direct order. They certainly can't factory press it if it's on a per order basis. My concern is what kind of guarantee do they have with these DVDRs? If they used cheap discs that break down after a couple of years, will they replace the defects?

KFS
kungfusamurai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 04:22 AM   #10
Mark Pollard
Administrator
 
Mark Pollard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 916
Default

Our policy on the forums, which is line with my opinion on the matter, is that bootleg or DVD-R selling or trading of specific cuts that can be purchased through legitimate channels is bad for the industry and consumers and should not be supported by fans. However, public domain or out-of-print cuts of films are fair game for trade but should not be sold for profit, at least on this site.

This is why we take a hard stance on PanMedia/Red Sun around here because they bootleg indiscriminately, in such a way that is directly harmful to the industry. Not to mention, their shady marketing and shoddy authoring as others have suggested.

Fans should be purchasing legit versions of remastered Golden Harvest and Shaw Brothers, although I don't have a problem with seeing people trading copies of the old English-dubbed VHS versions. A lot of the original English dub tracks have not been re-released officially.

There is a lot of confusion over the status of independent films which in my mind makes most of them fair game. For instance, Tai Seng supposedly holds the rights to a selection of indie titles purchased from the Ocean Shores library. These titles comprise their Martial Arts Theaters series. However, they purchased rights years ago and Ocean Shores long ago ceased to exist as a functioning business. So does Tai Seng now own the rights to these films indefinitely by default? I doubt it, yet they still keep repackaging them and releasing them. Many of the indie kung fu films were long ago sold off or abandoned by their original owners in Hong Kong and Taiwan.
Mark Pollard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2001-2009 Kung Fu Cinema