By

During a recent roundtable interview to promote THE SPY NEXT DOOR, international martial arts action star Jackie Chan was asked if he liked mixed martial arts and as always he spoke his mind.

“I don’t like to see ‘ultimate fighting.’ As a martial artist, I find it too violent putting them in a cage,” said Chan “At the end, it’s not fighting anymore. That’s not the martial arts. Martial arts is about respect. When somebody is knocked down, stop. I really respect Sugar Ray Leonard. Come on, [when a guy is down,] stop. Don’t fight. That’s not the spirit. When you’re down, I’ll grab you up. Are you OK? Should we continue? That’s the martial arts spirit. That’s what I want.”

His answer shouldn’t be a surprise. Chan comes from a stage performance background with no experience in competitive, full-contact fighting or defensive martial arts. Also, unlike Bruce Lee and Donnie Yen, he never developed an affinity for ground work in his choreography.

Chan’s duel with Brad Allen in the 1999 film GOREGOUS illustrates a good example of Chan’s philosophy towards martial arts which supports his views on MMA.

Source: ESPN.com

Related Topics:
 • 
  • jrserver

    Mark, do you think before you write these editorials about Ultimate Fighting? Part of Jackie's martial arts background is in Judo, to which the Gracie Family owes more than a little thanks. Not to mention the fact that if you were to put Jackie in the cage against the likes of, say, Matt Hughes, Jackie is more than accustomed to pain, and has, through the course of his career, broken both cheekbones, all of his fingers and toes, hips, nose (once at the hands of Bruce Lee), sternum, neck, ankle and ribs, dislocated his pelvis, and cracked his skull. What, pray tell, could the average MMA fighter possibly do to Jackie that he hasn't already experienced dozens of times?

  • Monk Sante

    Who knows what Jackie studied or didn't study? I personally don't like the MMA myself. I agree with Jackie on this, the arts were not intended to be used this way. Most of these MMA fighters will experience health problems 15 to 20 years from now from all the blows they receive in these fights, and for what? The only one laughing straight to the bank is Mr.Dana White!

  • Scurgar

    MMA > Jackie Chan.

  • Dragonwire

    I agree. MMA portrays martial artist's as big dumb meatheads with high ego's, and cocky toughguy attitudes.

  • yakuza01

    you do realize that we are talking about MMA, not boxing. The amount of blows to the head you get in your whole career in MMA, are a joke compared to what you get in boxing, get your facts straight. Look up an interview with Randy Couture, does he sound like he has a speech impediment? Nope, I didn't think so.

  • http://www.kungfucinema.com Mark Pollard

    I wasn't trying to knock Jackie Chan. I was just trying to point that he approaches fighting in his films from a different angle and that would be consistent with his views on MMA.

  • SoWutIfMahSnSux

    i love mma, but i completely understand and respect JC's opinion

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Nielven-Olis/621926626 Nielven Olis

    “When you’re down, I’ll grab you up. Are you OK? Should we continue? That’s the martial arts spirit. That’s what I want.”

    in other words, “screw jujitsu, i did not go thru all those years of trainin just to rub my body against another dude”

  • Mochi

    |Honor in Fighting| I like white too;D But why can't fighers respect their opponents? Giving respect to a person you battle against is key to demonstrating good sportmanship and honor.

    I agree with Jackie Chan's principal of respecting fellow athletes.

    However many people lack the spirit to lend a hand to their enemy and fight fairly. It also applies to how we treat people with the same level of respect. When a person is down, don't walk all over him like a doormat. Instead, offer a helping hand and smile a sincere smile. “^____^” That's how you win others' respect. Give lots of it!

  • jrserver

    Well, Mark, as long as you're willing to acknowledge that making a living fighting on film as opposed to fighting in the Octagon doesn't make one any less of a martial artist. I love the concept of MMA, but seldom the execution. I'd venture to say that a solid 90% of pro MMA just plain aren't very good, including those who rely exclusively on grappling. Most of them look like a bunch of eight-years in a schoolyard fight. So rarely do you see the level of speed, power, control, and grace from the likes of Matt Hughes that Jackie clearly possesses. I watch for the Cung Le's and Lyoto Machida's in the sport, guys who are not only highly skilled martial artists, but who also conduct themselves with honor. And Jackie's right, martial arts are about honor, and sadly, honor is one of the many aspect of martial arts that MMA is in desperate need of a serious dose of.

  • http://www.kungfucinema.com Mark Pollard

    Martial arts can be defined many ways but I feel honor is derived from participants following a code of conduct or set of rules that forms the foundation of self discipline and mutual respect. MMA fighting, film fighting and non-competitive martial arts training each have their own sets of rules and codes of conduct. As long as participants follow those rules within each sphere I see no reason not to respect them all.

  • R.F

    Jackie make fighting look nice while those monkey is cages make it look stupid. that is for me the biggest difference. MMA is just boring to watch and that is because it's a mess in my eyes, few kicks and wrestling are not very entertaining.

  • Gerry

    Hey guys,
    Jackie has earned his place in history is not because of who he is, rather because of his philosophy, don't you think so? MMA is just tooooo violent. I rather want to watch BOXING instead.

  • crosenblum

    Actually I agree with him…MMA is tougher but it is also less respectful.

    So what if he never done groundwork, what does that have to with mutual respect?

  • yong kim

    well spoken!! i agree 100%
    i always disliked MMA!! they have the nerve to call it mixed martial arts
    when most of these fighters cant throw a proper roundhouse kick.
    to me its nothing but a tough man contest!!
    there is no honer in these matches or spirit !!
    like chan said a real martial artist has the courage to let the other fighter
    get back on his feet!!
    its nothing but a cockfight with people!!

  • James Gonzales

    It's obvious that most here aren't familiar with the late Bruce Lee's influence on the Evolution of the Martial Arts and it's not a coincidence that Donnie Yen has incorporated MMA into his Fight Choreography. I'm a huge fan of Jackie Chan but he really dropped the ball on this one. MMA is not anything new (grappling arts have existed for centuries, read some History) and while I frown on the MTV-like “Real World” antics of the Ultimate Fighter T.V. reality show (Martial Arts is ultimately supposed to help you become a better Human Being, not kick holes in the walls & such) there is much merit & sportmanship in MMA. There is no reason to Hate what you don't Understand.

  • http://www.kungfucinema.com Mark Pollard

    I mention Chan's lack of groundwork because he was criticizing the fact that fighters continue to fight on the ground. But that came about because of the influence of jiu jitsu and other martial arts that make use of groundwork. The suggestion is that Chan considers such fighting to be disrespectful.

    I'm not arguing with or against him. I'm just making an observation.

  • hvc

    I'd be curious to know if Chan feels that his opinions about martial conduct have changed over the years (I'm sure they have), as films like Police Story have some pretty dirty fighting in them, particularly at the end of that film. Also, I kind of snicker inside when I hear the “martial arts is about (insert moral here)” line. Because yes, no doubt that is an element of martial arts, but martial arts were still developed to the kick the other person's ass. That's the martial part of the art.

  • jinkazama

    Its just an opinion, some people like MMA, some don't, just because you study martial arts doesn't mean you have to like every branch on the tree.

  • oinky

    Police Story, Project A, Wheels On Meals, Armour of God – all of it dirty fighting, so yes Chan has changed his tune to fit his new kiddie audience. Go where the money is. What a great businessman.Nicely choreographed fight but ugh the flashback and dialogue terrible. This mustve been the start of his kiddie friendly image.Ah well. We still have Donnie Yen. At least until he decides that MMA is not manly enough and decides to take up porn.

  • oinkythesecond

    Yeah like some poster already said, didnt Bruce Lee introduce MMA as Jeet Kune Do back in the 70s?

  • Kent108

    The martial arts were intended to help people kill before they themselves were killed, whether that's on your feet or on the ground. To think otherwise is naive.

  • Kent108

    To add to Mark's comment, Chan's attitude probably stems from a traditional/old-fashioned Chinese aversion to touching the ground with anything other than your feet. It's considered low class. This isn't just about martial arts or fighting; for instance, I was routinely smacked for sitting on the ground as a kid.

  • Kent108

    Matt Hughes is purportedly a decidedly unpleasant person, but if you think he doesn't express speed, power and explosiveness in the ring–as much as Jackie–you're out of your mind.

    And while I'll agree many mixed martial artists don't display exemplary technique, I think the lesson you should take from that fact is this: power, size, strength and conditioning are a much bigger part of martial effectiveness than most “technique” focused martial artists like to admit.

  • Kent108

    I've met plenty of “traditional” martial artists who are cocky a**holes too. At the same time, I've also met very respectful gentlemen who are excellent mixed martial artists. Case in point, Renzo Gracie is one of the nicest guys you're likely to ever meet. Outside the ring, anyway.

  • Kent108

    Jackie's 50-some years old and with his history of injuries, he wouldn't last 60 seconds in the ring with a top-level mixed martial artist. For god's sake, with that plate in his skull, one solid punch to the left side of his head and he'd die–literally.

    And yeah, Jackie's a tough guy who can take a lot of pain. But here's the thing: in all his movie injuries, once he's injured, that's it — they stop everything, bandage him up, or take him to the hospital. In a fight, what happens is Matt Hughes continues to pound your face until you're unconscious. Jackie can take a broken finger. Can he then take a broken cheekbone right afterward, followed by a broken rib, a broken nose and a black eye–and continue to fight? Maybe, maybe not.

  • Kent108

    Better not take that attitude if you ever get into a self defense situation.

  • Kent108

    Yeah, it does take a trained eye to really appreciate the strategy and subtlety that is characteristic of a classic MMA match.

  • JRserver

    To Kent108,
    “And while I'll agree many mixed martial artists don't display exemplary technique, I think the lesson you should take from that fact is this: power, size, strength and conditioning are a much bigger part of martial effectiveness than most “technique” focused martial artists like to admit.”
    If that were true, Royce Gracie, the UFC's first champion, would have gotten beaten into the ground like a railroad spike. Again, I love the CONCEPT of MMA, but the execution of it all to often leaves out both the “mixed” aspect of it, and any perceivable skill level on the part of 90% of the fighters.
    “Matt Hughes is purportedly a decidedly unpleasant person, but if you think he doesn't express speed, power and explosiveness in the ring–as much as Jackie–you're out of your mind.”
    Well, then I guess I must be late for my straight jacket fitting. Call me crazy if I don't see any perceptible level of skill present when one's fighting style looks like something out of pro wrestling and, like the majority of MMA fighters, has fallen into the very trap that Bruce Lee warned martial artists to avoid – predictability.
    “But here's the thing: in all his movie injuries, once he's injured, that's it — they stop everything, bandage him up, or take him to the hospital.”
    Well, that certainly shows how much you know about the injuries Jackie's incurred over the years. I'm guessing you didn't know that Jackie put a sock that looked like a sneaker around his broken ankle and continued filming the Hovercraft scene in “Rumble in the Bronx”, when his armed was accidently slashed by a sword during “Snake in the Eagle's Shadow”, etc. What Jackie demands of himself is infinitely more dangerous than anything he could possibly face in the Octagon, and pain really bothered him, he'd have retired from this line of work years ago.

  • JRserver

    And as to the “dirty” fights Jackie has filmed, what that statement forgets is that he and his opponents still rely on SKILL rather than brute force. And no one's saying that, in ancient times, martial arts were not used to kill, rather than simply fight off, an opponent (another reason why I feel that MMA, while a fantastic CONCEPT for sport fighting, is nothing original.) The admiration for Sugar Ray Leonard Jackie expressed in this article as well as his criticisms of MMA are clearly about sport fighting rather than the art of war. Not to mention the fact you don't kill or maim an opponent unless there's absolutely no other choice, just like you don't even fight them at all unless your out of options.

  • JRserver

    And as to the “dirty” fights Jackie has filmed, what that statement forgets is that he and his opponents still rely on SKILL rather than brute force. And no one's saying that, in ancient times, martial arts were not used to kill, rather than simply fight off, an opponent (another reason why I feel that MMA, while a fantastic CONCEPT for sport fighting, is nothing original.) The admiration for Sugar Ray Leonard Jackie expressed in this article as well as his criticisms of MMA are clearly about sport fighting rather than the art of war. Not to mention the fact you don't kill or maim an opponent unless there's absolutely no other choice, just like you don't even fight them at all unless your out of options.

  • jiujitsu77

    guys this is a whole different ballgame…and also one of the reasons MMA does not translate well on the screen. yeah meatheads have made it unbearable for most….including me…but to negate it's importance in martial arts in general is strictly foolish.
    i love jackie…but im not the type of guy who is going to wait for my opponent to get up and just get angrier with me because i knocked him down….this could also rely on the scenario i suppose. and no one ever said that fighting (no matter what style) is pretty. it's ugly fellas. very ugly. bruce knew it, sugar ray knew it, and anyone who has ever had to use their training in a real fight knows it.

  • JRserver

    And to Mark's comment,
    I agree, he probably does find fighting a grounded opponent to be disrespectful, and that's his perogative. Just because one doesn't care for a particular aspect of fighting doesn't mean that one is incapable of acknowledging whatever strengths it possesses. I have nothing but respect for the grappling arts, but as I've said before, my major quarrel with MMA is that most of the fighters, including those who rely exclusively on grappling, just aren't very good fighters, in my opinion. Donnie Yen had next to no experience in ground work at all prior to SPL and FLASH POINT, yet he looks far more professional and experienced then most of the other so-called “experts”. All too often, UFC fighters bear great resemblance to the no-skill bruisers one might see in “Fight Club”, and I thinks that's one of the negative effects that MMA is having on the way that martial arts perceived by the general public, particularly by adolescents. They're coming to view MMA as the modern equivalent of pro-wrestling, rather than an evolutionary step forward in the development in martial arts, and could care less about whether or not either fighter achieves victory through skill; they just wanna see two guys clobber each until one or the other is flattened. And don't even get me started on the 29-year old rednecks you run into in a bar or a restaurant every Saturday night who've watched 1,000 UFC fights and trained in MMA for two months, and claim to be experts, and in some cases, professional fighters themselves.
    I apologize if I came off a bit too abrasive in my first comment, Mark, but I felt the need to defend Jackie, as I had erroneously thought you were attacking him. In any case, MMA, to me: Fantastic concept, albeit hardly a new one, that's needs a dose of fighters who conduct themselves with honor and who display genuine skill.

  • James Gonzales

    There is a huge difference between Movie fight choreography, Sport fighting & actual Combat. That “snicker inside” you hear applies to all Martial Artists, Traditional, MMA or others…..When you climb a ladder, do you leave your Brain on floor behind you? No, you do not , You generally take it with You. Not all, but most do, unless one is a Martial robot or bully. Remember that the Shaolin Temple sought to establish the connection between physical practice and mental training on which Shaolin martial art training is based, seeking ways to develop as a human being and maintain harmony when addressing power and aggression. That “Element” of the Martial Arts can be expressed by the Yin/Yang Symbol, The Physical & The Mental balance each other, there is not One without the Other. I recommend reading “Zen In The Martial Arts”, “A Fighter's Heart: One Man's Journey Through the World of Fighting”, Bruce Lee's Tao Of Jeet Kune Do” or the Life Story Of Miyamoto Musashi. All by Martial Artists who understand the Philosophy, Psychology & Wisdom to mature as a Human Being because you aren't going to spend the majority of your Life “Kicking the other persons ass”

  • Lionclaw77

    I agree 100%

  • http://www.illmindedstreetwear.com/ Yoda

    Jackie dislike MMA because he doesn't watch MMA. If you love Martial Arts you are bound to love MMA. Been watching SB movies, Jackie, Jet, Bruce, Donnie, and Sammo all my life. When people say MMA has no respect, they are talking out of their asses. When was the last time they saw MMA? Matt Hughes? lol I can tell that these people didn't give MMA a chance. Fedor, GSP, Penn, Machida, Shogun, they are all respectable fighters. Machida has been training karate since he was a kid, Shogun is a muy thai expert, and Bj is a master at Brazilian Jujitsu. Don't tell me they have been training all their life for respect, and throw it in the trash when they enter MMA. Come on people, their the classiest fighters out there. Comparing it to fight club is comical. You guys are talking like you know MMA. MMA has changed since 2002, its 2010 now, and it has spread all over the world. Abu dhabi just purchased 10% of UFC. You know what that means right? India, China, and all of asia will be influence. “MMA is still a baby in China, but it will grow”-Gracie. You guys are talking like you know Jackie. I love Old School Jackie. Now he is just trying to make money and bad movies…come on, spy kids or what ever you call it is a junk. Hk is the way to go for Jackie…everybody has been saying it since around the world in 80 days. One bad apple doesn't mean the whole tree is rotten!

  • R.F

    The good thing about being a human being is that you are NOT bound to like anything for that matter, so i must then be spaking out of my ass accoriding to you. Cause i do not enjoy watching fights where they laying down and run albows into eachother eyesockets. It's the way pussies fight in the street. no honor message in it what so ever. many many many thumbs up to Jackie who will be remembered 100 year after his death the fighter in MMA will not

  • http://www.illmindedstreetwear.com/ Yoda

    its kind of Ironic because The whole world is doing what China and Japan use to do back in the days. Well, Japan is still in the game. Going to dojo's to challenge great masters. The best fighters are always humble. Take Fedor, Never been defeated, except for a cut on his head that was called off by the ref. He is humble as hell. Asian people are forgetting their roots. If you watch MMA closely, there are dojos fighting dojos in the sport. Matt Hughs team, Nogera's team, its reminiscent of students getting defeated and the master or the brother has to step in and declare their arts more superior by defeating the opponent who defeated their brother or student. When Hughs defeated one of the Gracie, he said it was the “Brazillian Jujitsu that lead him to victory. Hugh's rejected the comment and said it was American wrestling. So there is a sense of pride to what you “use” and where your “from”. AKa northern fist or southern style. Brazil is the leader right now with super fighters. Here in Orange County California, all the Asians are into MMA. The rest of the world should catch on. what happened to the Ip man, or Huo Yuanjia spirit? Asia is making films about the pass while the world is living in it. lol

  • R.F

    Me personally don't find it entertaining. I rather watch dolphins jumping in the water.

  • http://www.illmindedstreetwear.com/ Yoda

    in reply to RF…See what i mean when people are talking out of their asses? When the elbow comes down to the eye socket…its illegal buddy. Can't do that. U must be one of those poeple who watched MMA when it was in 1999. If u understand both sides, then talk. If you don't, you sound ignorant. Like hitting the elbow in the eye. LMFAO

  • R.F

    But it happens don't it? eye injuries?
    Yes its my human right to speak freely you know, or do you prefer nodding dolls who agree on everything?
    The whole consept should be banned had it been up to me. ask a not bought doctor what he think about it…!
    neither way it's boring to watch. and there is alot of people who think the same. I rather see staged fighting not wrestling

  • reefer

    Jackie needs to see the movie Redbelt. To me, probably one of the best true martial arts films in the last ten years. The film is all about honor. Despite Jackie's fame and achievements in film, I can't really point to one of his projects that approaches Redbelts scope in terms of respect toward martial arts.

  • Simon Wyndham

    They were used to kill I'm afraid. But the thing that always gets glossed over is that traditionally the martial arts were mainly weapons based. The hand skills were used to build character, but weren't regarded as much practical importance. The reason being that the martial arts were for armies to be used on a battlefield where weapons were the main way of fighting.

    It is only in relative modern times and when weapons for civilians were banned that empty hand martial arts really flourished. Make no mistake though, they were still meant for doing serious damage. The idea that martial arts are about honour and not fighting is a load of rubbish.

    Some of the most famous Chinese martial artists were bandits! The whole thing about being spiritual and honourable seems to have stemmed from the supposed connection with Shaolin Temple. But as any historian knows the Shaolin Temples real connection with the development of Chinese martial arts is patchy at best, and unfortunately most of what people think they know about it has been learn't from HK movies rather than real history.

  • James Gonzales

    In reply to Mr. Wyndham:
    As with any Skill, Sport or even Work, the Individual can keep it plain & simple or seek a more Cerebral meaning to it. The Ancients knew this because they were not going to be at War 24/7. Warriors put their Swords or Fists down eventually to raise a Family or build House, maybe even a town here One could Live & Work, All Honourable things. Martial Arts of all types can be used to destroy but it also has a bigger part in History than just Killing.
    From the Grappling Arts of Greece to the more recent Krav Maga, there is History if you research.
    http://library.thinkquest.org/trio/TTQ07031/his…

    http://www.shaolin.com/historycontent.aspx

    http://home.vtmuseum.org/genealogy/chi_sim/chi_…

    http://www.namyang.co.uk/learn-martial-arts/art…

  • Kent108

    JRServer, you can't have it both ways. You use Royce Gracie as an example of a UFC fighter who displayed superior technique to beat out superior athleticism, strength, speed and size. Then you tell me that Matt Hughes has neither technique nor athleticism (strength, power, conditioning, etc.)

    Well, when Matt Hughes fought Royce Gracie, Matt Hughes beat Royce Gracie so badly he might as well have been fighting a 12 year old girl. So tell me, was it Hughes' superior athleticism or his superior technique that led to this victory? Or are you suggesting it was fixed? Or perhaps you'd like to blame it on Royce's age. But isn't age merely a way of saying Royce was diminished athletically? In which case, my point that brute force and athleticism can overcome superior technique has still been proven.

    You say you “don't see any perceptible level of skill present” because Highes' style “looks like something out of pro wrestling.” In other words, Matt Hughes' skills, techniques and tactics don't resemble your preconceived, narrow and limited mental image of what a fight “should” look like. And in your close mindedness, YOU'RE the one who has fallen in to the trap Bruce Lee most wanted martial artists to avoid: self-imposed limitation. After all, Lee himself was, at the time of his death, avidly studying grappling and groundfighting and incorporating it into his arsenal. Wrestling is an art form, and for all you want to disparage “pro wrestling,” those guys are world class athletes and stuntmen just as skilled and tough as Jackie Chan.

    As for Jackie's injuries: I know about as much as you, if not more. Sure, Jackie's suffered a lot of injuries, many of which were serious. And sure, he works through pain. But there is ALWAYS at least five minutes–if not hours–for Jackie to regroup mentally, to refocus, to brace himself, to take painkillers–before he needs to go again. Because if nothing else, they need to re-set up the shot–the props, the cameras, the set, the wardrobe, etc. That Rumble in the Bronx scene you mention? What, you think that cast on his foot set in a few seconds, and then they were able to paint the hardened cast to resemble a sneaker in 10 seconds? Nope, without a doubt, even if they had a doctor set the cast on set right away, there would have been another few hours before it hardened enough. Of course, by then the light would have changed, so most likely he had an entire day to take painkillers, rest up, and mentally refocus.

    In a real fight or match, you generally don't have the luxury of taking a few minutes to recompose yourself and shake the cobwebs out of your head when you take a nasty hit–the next hard shot is coming down the pipe, and so is the next … and the next one … and the next one. I'm not convinced Jackie has the kind of mental training and toughness that is required for that kind of thing.

    In short, your assessment of Jackie's real-world fighting capabilities and of Matt Hughes' skills and athleticism show that you clearly are neither an athlete nor a knowledgeable martial artist or fighter. Clearly you have never sparred with any level of contact, nor have you worked with a top caliber fighter or athlete. Your opinions about fighting are clearly derived from Hong Kong cinema, which is hardly known to represent the epitome of realism.

    Jet Li, who worked with a few UFC fighters (Liddell, Couture, Ortiz) in Cradle 2 the Grave, opined that he wouldn't last 10 seconds in the ring with those guys, as far as a real fight or match goes. I'm pretty sure Jackie himself would say the same.

    In other words, I'm pretty sure even Jackie would disagree with you.

  • Kent108

    I honestly can't believe you're trying to imply that Donnie Yen is better at MMA and grappling than the guys who trained him simply based on what you saw IN HIS MOVIES.

    Moves are not real life. Don't you get it? Real fights NEVER look as pretty as they do in the movies. And Donnie Yen, as great as he is, would get his butt kicked by the guys who had trained him, and he'd be the first to admit it. Probably because unlike you, he has experience and training grounded in reality.

    To be fair, I share your concerns about how MMA as a sport is warping public perception of the martial arts in general, and I share your opinion about the average MMA fan.

  • Kent108

    In what world is “being able to throw a proper roundhouse kick” a requirement for being considered a martial artist?

    Most judo, wing chun, aikido, escrima, taiji, xingyi, and BJJ guys can't throw a proper roundhouse kick. Are you telling me that Hawkins Cheung, Chen Xiaowang, Jigoro Kano, and the Sayoc's weren't “real martial artists”?

    And what kind of “honer” (sic) and “spirit” did you want the fighters in the UFC to display? Most matches begin with fighters touching gloves out of respect and end with the loser shaking hands with or hugging the victor. And in most cases, most matches involve fighters who abide by the same rules and fight back from setbacks and hard knocks, displaying heart and determination.

    That sounds like honor and spirit to me.

  • jrserver

    to Kent108
    1.) Considering that Gracie fought at a time when the UFC had ALMOST no rules, whereas Hughes fights under a much more organized version of MMA, I don't think you can that direct of a comparison. Gracie lost after the ref stopped the fight, which never happened at all in the UFC's early days. And I never claimed that Gracie had a particularly stunning skill level (at least outside of grappling, as evidenced by his horrific kicking skills.)
    2.) I've studied Shaolin Ch'aun fa, Tae Kwon Do, Shotokan, Krav Maga, Aikido, Jujitsu, and Boxing, and my goal is to also add Vovinam, Chang quan, Judo, Ukidokan, and Jeet Kune Do to my arsenal. Way to close my mind there ,and avoid athletic, contact based sparring.
    3.) Whatever interval of time Jackie spends between takes doesn't change the fact that he's preparing to engage in an activity that could do him infinitely more damage than any UFC fighter could ever dream to, and he's spent the better part of thirty years doing it. I could count on one hand the number of professional fighters whose careers have lasted half that amount of time.
    4.) When have Jackie or Jet EVER claimed they could mop the floor with anyone they run into (although, considering the bitter nature of the training both endured in early childhood under the Chinese government, I'd once again argue that they're quite used to pain at this point.) On the commentary track for “Gorgeous”, Jackie talks about how he allowed himself to lose in his first match against Bradley James Allen and how he wanted to die in “Police Story 3″, because he had been asking himself at that point, “Why do I always win?” And in his directorial debut, “Born to Defense”, Jet spends the majority of that film getting his butt kicked. That's another reason why the UFC is so lacking in honor; every fight is preceded with each fighter talking about how they're the best of the best and how they beat the other guy senseless; Jackie and Jet and others like them embody the spirit of martial arts because they've learned to keep their egos in check and that they're skills don't exist to prove themselves to everyone else; if I lose, I lose, and I'm fine with that; you learn more from losing than you do from winning.

  • http://www.wirthconsulting.org Kraak Mo

    I don't like gratuitous violence or brutality even in my beloved movies. So it's safe to say that I don't like MMA either. However, I love martial arts because its essence contains none of the above.

  • KingA

    you fckin idiots underate jackie chan to the largest extent ever. just cuz jackie chan talks about respect, doesnt mean he can fck u up from any side possible.