Remo Williams: The Adventure Begins (1985)

  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
Reviews | Film Reviews | by Mark Pollard
Editor's Rating:
User Rating:
VN:R_U [1.5.4_809]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

It’s the action movie franchise that never was. As its full title suggests, REMO WILLIAMS: THE ADVENTURE BEGINS was intended to kick off a new movie franchise based on the long-running pulp novel series known as THE DESTROYER. The $40 million action comedy stars Fred Ward as a former police officer who has his past and identity erased as he is reluctantly recruited into a shadowy government agency tasked with taking out bad guys that the judicial system cannot. Trained in the fantasy martial art of sinanju by his soap opera-loving Korean mentor, Chiun (played by Joel Grey regrettably appearing in “Oriental” prosthetics), Remo is ordered by his no-nonsense boss (Wilford Brimley) to take on corrupt government contractors dealing in arms. The film flopped at the box office in 1985 with mixed reception from critics and fans of the books. The film has since found cult appreciation thanks to repeated airings on cable TV in years since but the initial failure of this wannabe action movie remains justified.

The paperback novels that the movie is based on began appearing in 1971 under the dual authorship of Warren Murphy and the late Richard Sapir. The books now number well over a hundred with many having been ghost-written by a variety of authors including infamous kung fu movie patron Ric Meyers. The series is a mash up of cultural and genre conventions involving political intrigue, super spies, assassins, secret associations, martial arts, Asian religion, sex, and sci-fi and fantasy elements. This hearty stew is served with a healthy portion of political and social satire that many fans of the series would count as the best feature.

“THE DESTROYER” itself is a reference to Shiva, the Hindu god of destruction. Chiun, who over the course of the series develops a close fatherly bond with the hero believes that Remo is a reincarnation of this god. This supernatural concept is tied in with the authors’ creation of sinanju, an invented Korean martial art that Chiun is master of. It is said to be the origin of all modern Asian martial arts which would contradict accepted theories that Asian martial arts originated either in India, China or Mongolia, not that such claims really matter given that new martial arts techniques are often founded on experience and need rather than tradition.

Screenwriter Christopher Wood (MOONRAKER) ignored much of what made the book series popular by generating a bland and poorly constructed script with uninteresting and stereotypical villians. The books contained all sorts of outlandish characters for Remo to contend with including super-soldiers, androids and even a Chinese vampire but all we see in the movie are a couple vaguely criminal-minded military officers and defense contractors dealing in poorly-designed weaponry. It’s hardly a challenge for highly-trained assassins capable of dodging bullets, nimbly hopping around scaffolding surrounding the Statue of Liberty or effortlessly performing light-step skills over the surface of water and wet cement like wuxia heroes.

The script also clumsily attempts to inject the film with a small measure of the humor that is apparently common in the books. Government contractors and the military portrayed as villains and/or baffoons and references to the “Star Wars” program suggests effort to make a statement about the military industrial complex and corporate greed but there is nothing funny or witty about how it’s done. If there is any parody it seems unintentional, or at the very least far too understated, such as the goofy military radio chatter we hear.

Most of the humor comes from the relationship between Remo and Chiun. Had I never seen dozens of other master-student relationships portrayed in martial arts films I might have found this one to be adequate. There is chemistry between the two actors, both of whom are actually good at their trade. However, Grey’s character is never anything but a pitifully weak copy of far more substantial and entertaining Asian martial arts masters. For starters, the film should have found a real Asian actor, preferrably Korean. Even for 1986, Asian prosthetics on a Caucasian actor is an embarrassment. At least John Carpenter had the grace to actually hire Asian actors for Asian roles in his similar in tone yet far superior action comedy BIG TROUBLE IN LITTLE CHINA. The only way it could have worked would have been as an intentional parody of race stereotyping similar to what Robert Downey Jr. did by wearing “blackface” in TROPIC THUNDER.

The rest of Grey’s act involves cliched fortune cookie utterances, juvenile similes and zen-like posturing. If these traits were all conceived in the books during the 1970s then the character might have seemed fresh and interesting at the time. But in 2008, this kind of characterization is the cultural equivalent of caveman grunts. What makes the performance worse is that for a martial arts master, Chiun displays no knowledge or experience of anything resembling martial arts. It’s all fantasy rubbish consisting of pressure point attacks, dodging bullets at point blank range and training that never has anything to do with engagement.

The film devotes a significant portion of its running time to the training that Chiun puts Remo through, training that is supposed to prepare him to be an assassin by using his body as a weapon. Yet all Remo is shown how to do is jump around onto objects (similar to Chinese plum flower pole training), hang off the side of a ferris wheel car and run over beach sand, two inches over beach sand with nothing but air underneath him. He’s being groomed as an assassin and yet he learns nothing about how to actually kill people, nor do we get to see how he learns to dodge bullets. One day, Chiun whips out a gun and starts firing and suddenly Remo is making like Neo in THE MATRIX, only without the nifty visual and camera effects. There is a massive leap across a raging river of disbelief that audiences are supposed to make that is never quite possible. Maybe if we had the ability to walk on water and simultaneously dazzle a platoon of armed soldiers then it would be easier.

Guy Hamilton, helmer of quite a few classic action films including the BATTLE OF BRITAIN (1969) and four James Bond movies topped by GOLDFINGER (1964) and THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN (1974) has little to work with in this feature but offers competent direction anyway.

Hamilton’s direction is beefed up by excellent cinematography by Andrew Laszlo, a DP who previously lent his camera skills to Walter Hill’s cult classic THE WARRIORS (1979) and JAMES CLAVELL’S SHOGUN (1980), the TV mini-series. Laszlo definitely makes the most of the film’s signature action sequence on the Statue of Liberty which as the time was undergoing restoration and was surrounded by scaffolding. The scene plays out very much like something from a James Bond movie but as with most of the action sequences, it lacks a certain punch that can be at least partly blamed on the lousy villains. In this case they’re three construction workers hired on the spot to toss Remo off the statue. As implausible as that is, what’s worse is the pointlessness of Remo being on the top of the statue in the first place.

There are two short fight sequences in the movie. The first is probably the best and takes place before Remo is even recruited or trained as an assassin. As a police officer he gets in a classic Hollywood-style bash-up brawl with three thugs. Towards the end, an idiot henchman dons a gas mask and chooses to enter a locked room filling with poisonous gas to fight Remo who otherwise would have died. How Remo uses him to get out of that predicament is pure lunacy that is only outmatched by the ridiculousness of how Remo dispatches the remaining bad guys. It involves a perfectly timed release of logs while suspended 50 feet in the air, some superhuman bullet dodging and the lighting of a tree branch by rubbing his thumb on it. Right…

It’s really hard to tell whether Hamilton was trying to shoot REMO WILLIAMS as a spoof or as a real action movie with some humor. This is often a sign of trouble when audiences cannot easily categorize a movie. This may have been a reason why the film did so poorly. It’s not a great film but it’s no worse than RAW DEAL, INVASION U.S.A. or any number of other B-grade ’80s actioners. Ultimately, what it’s lacking is clearer definition. The filmmakers could have focused on just a few elements and made them more distinctive and colorful. For an example of how it’s done right, look no further than BIG TROUBLE IN LITTLE CHINA.

Related Topics:

  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

  • Matthew H
    RE: Mike Leeder
    Chuck's "Eye for an Eye" was a rip-off of the Destroyer, not a nod of the head. BTW Chuck's too little to play Remo. No offense to Chuck I know he can kick my @$$.
    The Destroyer Series and Doc Savage were the books I learned to read with even before kindergarten. Remo was my hero as a child(in retrospect not the best role model I know), and I wasn't even as disappointed as you guys. You want to talk disappointment lets look at the old Remo Williams TV series with Jeff Meek and Roddy McDowell. That was horrible!
    This movie wasn't as bad as all that, unless you have high hopes for any book turned movie produced by Hollywood. If you do, then it's your own fault for giving them way too much credit. I can't think of one film that lives up to the book. Murnau's "Nosferatu" doesn't even pull it off and it's brilliant. You can't compare a book to it's movie counterpart unless you learn to live with disappointment.
    Besides, if you make the movie just like the book, what's the point? That story is already out there, why do it again? Have a look at "Forbidden Planet." That was based on Shakespeare's "The Tempest" great film, great play, completely different but not disappointing at all. The story has to change or it may just as well be plagiarism.
    In all fairness, yes, the movie could have been better, but with the script and budget they had to work with, this movie was enjoyable and still is. The Asian stereotype thing... get over it, I live in Georgia how do you think it makes us feel when some idiot from New York does a pathetic slurring southern accent. It annoys me but I'm not getting a sign and picketing the studios. Those guys are arrogant goobs and we can't change that. Just enjoy the movies, they're for entertainment!
  • Bronx Bomber
    The review of this film isn't too far off of the mark. The story is never really held together that well and the first 15 minutes of the film left me feeling as though I were watching the pilot to the "Knight Rider" TV series (the whole secret identity thing). That wouldn't be a bad thing necessarily accept that this was suppsoed to be a feature film and as it progresses it doesn't even hold up as well as "Knight Rider". That said, it still has a softspot in my heart, but I wouldn't recommend it for much more than a rainy Saturday afternoon and that's only if you haven't seen it before.
  • Sunny
    Big Trouble in little China is one of the best movie ever!
  • Morgan
    Leaving some things to your imagination in movies is something that is underrated these days but "Remo" reveals enough to be exciting. fred ward and joel grey as well as the rest of the cast were great and offer far better acting than most real kung fu people can deliver. The action was good considering non martial arts actors, I'd much rather see this movie than some real pros swinging back and forth on wires and fighting with the film sped up. "Big trouble" was also a major dissapointment at the box office. it wasn't funny and wasted a huge cast of well known martial arts masters hardly seen in it's several short fight scenes. Carpenter didn't have to make up a white guy to look oriental to get into trouble with a group outside the set protesting the stereotyping of asians.
  • danmye
    Too many legitimate martial artists out there to not have a better job done with the series today. Chuck Norris does not present enough of a humourous appeal, and is too wooden, to play the role of Remo for me. Maybe Jeff Speakman and Jackie Chan, Gordon Liu, Franky Lau, Yuen Woo Ping (if he could be persuaded away from directing briefly), Yuen Biao or even (weight aside)Sammo Hung. Heck, even Ti Lung or Lau Kar Yan...
  • Al Scorcho
    if you go to warren murphy's website, you can buy a copy of the uproduced Destroyer screenplay that he wrote with Richard Saphir. In the intro to the book he makes a sly reference to Chuck Norris' Eye For an Eye being made after they turned down a deal with Chuck's agent.

    warrenmurphy.com
  • remo
    I believe that Murphy is actually trying to get a new Hollywood project off the ground, the rights recently reverted back to him. Not holding my breath, but it would be interesting to see what they could do today. The fact that the books currently don't have a publisher probably speaks volumes for his chance of success.
  • Remo, you may have a point regarding the fantasy aspect of the film's martial arts. My problem with how it was presented in this film is basically what you suggested. They didn't go far enough, hence my comparison to BIG TROUBLE. That film had nothing to do with the DESTROYER series but Carpenter took his fantasy elements much further and I never had a problem accepting them because it was intentionally over-the-top. REMO WILLIAMS could have benefited greatly from a lot of special effects, which is another reason why I think someone should make another attempt at adapting the series to film or TV.
  • While I agree that the film is a pale imitation of the books, I have to say that I quite enjoyed the film. I sat down to watch it with my brother the other night (thanks to the Xbox 360's new Netflix functionality) and was surprised that the film more or less lived up to my memories. The last time I'd seen it was in the early 90's, and while I can't defend a single thing about it (yes, Joel Grey is rediculous, the villains are lame, and the pacing is uneven) - I still enjoyed it.

    I think it's Fred Ward that makes the movie work for me. I've always been a fan of his and I think he was a great choice for the role.

    I'll second the notion, though, that a Destroyer reboot would be awesome.
  • remo
    Also, The Destroyer has always had a strong element of social commentary and satire -- often parodying current events, down to using dopplegangers for famous celebrities like Dan Rather, Shirley McClaine, etc.

    I don't think the movie successfully captured that aspect of the series, but humor has always been an element.
  • remo
    Agree that the movie overall was a disappointment, but the Remo/Chiun relationship was spot on to the books. (having read at least 100 of them) And while I agree that an Asian actor would have been preferable, Joel Grey did an amazing job with Chiun.

    I really enjoyed the first half but the movie falters due to a weak main villain, as is often the case with Hollywood films like this.

    As for being "fantasy rubbish" well, that's sort of the point. It's no more rubbish than wu xia characters lightly dancing across tree tops. Remo's abilities are actually toned down quite a bit; it would require a significant amount of CGI to accurately portray the carnage he wreaks in the books. (think the dexterity of Spiderman plus the gore of Rambo IV)
  • jiujitsu77
    i know i know....even the comic magazines were better than the movie...but i still love this film. great memories of trying to scale buildings after watching cable television when i was 5
  • Now would actually be a great time to reboot the franchise, either in film or TV, with an eye towards using better martial arts action and actors capable of performing their own fighting moves. There is a wealth of material to mine and not much to compare it with presently in theaters or on TV.
  • Mike Leeder
    While the film doesnt come close to the books, I do like the movie, it had some nice ideas and i find myself watching and wondering what could have been...no disrespect to Fred Ward but think what could be done with someone a little more physical as Remo....(Chuck Norris "Eye for an Eye" movie, always comes across as Chuck's nod of the head to the series, as he teams up with Mako to bring down the bad guys).....an interesting oddity is the "Remo" TV pilot with jeffrey meek(later of "Raven")as Remo, and Roddy McDowall as Chuin...cringe worthy at times, it also hints at what could have been if the film had become a series, or if they'd expolored it properly on TV as a series.....

    Korean superkicker Kim Won-jin was at one point trying to develop a somewhat Remo inspired tale, with him reprising the role of "Sunny" from "Operation Scorpio/Scorpion King" who had recovered from his defeat and become a Chuin'like master training a young western protege like Brad Allan to become the new master of Sinaju, ah what could have been...
blog comments powered by Disqus