When I first heard about THE EXPENDABLES, I almost fainted.  Since then, I’ve been thinking about little else in my life, mostly occupying my days and nights with dreams of the best cinematic hard men (minus a few notable exceptions) all teaming up in the action film to end all action films.  Finally the day came when I was able to see the film, so I packed my extra tight briefs and entered into the cinema, almost unable to handle my excitement.

Now, THE EXPENDABLES was great.  In some cases really great.  Yet I was still disappointed.  In some cases very disappointed.  To be honest I should have expected it, and in a way I sort of did – there was no way the film could have lived up to my expectations.  What a jip.

To best relay my thoughts, I’ve decided to focus on each of the main ‘Expendables’ and explain why I think they worked/didn’t work/were a waste of space.

Firstly:

Sly Stallone: Big man on campus was truly giving it the big’un in this one.  He hogged most of the best one-liners, had a great deal of the best fight sequences and was pretty much the lynch-pin upon which the film hung – fair enough, this was his baby.  Stallone is also in excellent shape for a 64 year old and he certainly gives it his all during all of his action scenes.  The only gripe with his character is with his forced ‘banter’ with the other cast mates – in particular Jason Statham.  The quips and asides are so contrived and obvious that they become the opposite of funny, case in point – the oft-seen sequence in the trailer where Statham receives a text during a stand-off.  Really?  Big mis-fire, that one (and all the others).

Fight-wise, Stallone mostly plays with guns and grenades – including an entirely stupid (but really cool, man) lightning fast reloading technique.  However, he does have a chance to go mano-a-mano with Steve Austin during one of the most lengthy physical fights – the behind the scenes reports of his injuries during the tussle also lending an authenticity to it that makes it all the more realistic.  During this fight sequence, aside from a lot of heavy punching and headbutting, Stallone incorporates a few really nifty (yet ludicrous) grappling techniques and throw-downs, which certainly evoked a few yelps from me and the audience.  But mainly me.

Actually, maybe only me.

Jason Statham: Again, like Sly, Statham gets the majority of screen-time and even (gasp!) a backstory (something concerning Charisma Carpenter’s ‘character’).  Action-wise though, Statham’s on form and the sheer power displayed in all of his bouts is punch-in-the-face impressive.  He gets a few hand-to-hand combat scenes (including a hilarious one in a basketball court) but as with Stallone, he’s mostly tied down with his guns and more prominently, his throwing knives – an endless arsenal of which he seems to possess.

His is one of the only characters with any substance, but such is the nature of this ‘substance’, that it becomes almost entirely redundant and completely pointless.  I doubt anybody in the audience cared a jot about his relationship with Charisma Carpenter (who it seems exists solely to get punched in the face by another man), as it was treated so flippantly that it came across completely forced and really didn’t inform Statham’s character at all.

Mickey Rourke: Rourke doesn’t do any fighting and is basically an extended cameo whose function is to provide Stallone with a bit of a backstory and to lament on life and existence through a monologue that provides the film’s only hint of intelligence.

Jet Li: This was where the film came unstuck for me.  Jet Li was the actor that I was most excited about seeing in this movie – BUT HE’S HARDLY BLOODY WELL IN IT.  He’s sidelined for most of the first half and only brought in when it’s time to fight Dolph Lundgren.  Now, you’d think a fight between Jet Li and Dolph Lundgren would be a highlight – no dice.  It was a truly terrible example of ADD editing and shaky-cam disorientation that allowed neither actor to showcase any semblance of physical skill – it really could have been anyone in this fight scene such was the lack of any coherent martial arts.  They even got Corey Yuen to choreograph it – that’s like hiring Hans Zimmer to provide a fantastic score for your movie, then sneaking into the studio and recording yourself screaming over the whole thing. Why use Jet Li if you’re going to edit all his fight scenes to death?

Still, there’s a funny sequence where he goes on about being short.

Dolph Lundgren: Easily my favourite character.  He plays a completely whacked-out, drug-addled nutcase that’s obsessed with guns and hurting people.  He provides the film’s best kill (within the first 10 minutes) and also the film’s funniest moment – after crushing a man’s head under his foot (whilst driving a truck) he growls “INSECT!” – could not stop laughing at that bit.  Alas, as I have already mentioned, his major fight scene with Li is destroyed by the speed-addicted editor.  Oh well.  INSECT!

Randy Couture: Luckily, not completely wasted.  We understand that he’s hard, we understand that he’s no actor (he’s definitely no actor) – so what we’re left with is his fighting skill.  Luckily, most of Couture’s fight scenes aren’t too marred by the over-zealous editing and we are treated to a great deal of spectacular grappling moves – particularly during his fight with Steve Austin.

Steve Austin: Austin probably hogs all of the best fight scenes in the movie as well as possessing one of the best characters.  He’s got no background and is no more than a hulking, insane henchman, but he’s so good at it that it doesn’t matter.  His fight scenes are adrenaline pumping smack-downs that draw on his massive wrestling experience and result as some of the most brutal and powerful duff-ups that I’ve ever seen.

Gary Daniels: Another Expendable that I was looking forward to seeing.  No need to throw that one in my face Stallone!  Shall we give him some good fight scenes?  Naa,  let’s strap the camera to a pneumatic drill and smudge to hell and back most of the fighting – even when he’s against Jet Li!  Such a waste of good performers who clearly know their stuff.

However, I must make it clear that it would be wrong to say that these fights weren’t good, because they were certainly entertaining, but anyone wanting any hint of actual, visible martial arts will be sorely disappointed.  They could have been so much better.

Eric Roberts: Also, those looking for any fighting on behalf of Eric Roberts will be shafted – he doesn’t lift a foot.  However, he does play a suitably slimy villain and as the main antagonist, actually does quite well – but then again, I like Eric Roberts in anything, so maybe it’s not the best judge of performance coming from me.

Terry Crews: I thought Crews would be the comic relief in this one.  Unfortunately, it’s pretty hard to be funny when you’re only on screen for about ten minutes.  Still, he just about manages it – well, his gun does at least – in what must be one of the most ludicrous -and therefore, hilarious – scenes in action movie history.  I won’t ruin it, but once Crews talks about how the enemy are ‘always scared of noise’, you’ll see it coming.

Yet apart from this one moment of genius, Crews is again another casualty of trying to cram too many stars in one movie without properly developing their characters first.

Bruce Willis and Arnold Schwarzenegger: This scene is INTENSELY PLEASING.

***

So there we have it.  A really good film that blasted its way through my expectations barrier THE WRONG WAY and therefore did itself an unfortunate disservice.  Had I not been expecting some real martial arts courtesy of Li, Daniels, Lundgren et al, I would have enjoyed it a great deal more – I’ll just have to make do I suppose.

Aside from the ruined martial arts, the rest of the action is handled effectively by Stallone and the numerous car chases, aeroplane attacks/getaways and gunplay sequences are suitably pulse-pounding affairs.  As a brainless action film, it’s certainly up there with the greats, there’s just the odd niggle that’ll annoy some people – although clearly not enough people to stop them making the already-greenlit sequel.  Hopefully they can iron out the creases for that one.  Get The Rock and Mark Dacascos on board and I’ll be happy.

Although it may seem like I’m slating the film in some areas, I still really enjoyed it and found it a great deal more entertaining than many recent action movies.  It was far more violent, gritty, manly and exciting than a vast amount of Hollywood ‘action-lite’ movies of late and I’d still highly recommend it – it’s just a good idea to lower your expectations just that little bit.

You INSECT.

REVIEW: Expendables, The (2010), 7.1 out of 10 based on 18 ratings

by

Related Topics:
 •   •   •   •   •   •   •   •   •   •   •   • 
  • remo

    Why would you expect a Western-produced war film to feature extended, intricate martial arts sequences?

  • GazzO

    I didn't expect extended or intricate, I just expected to be able to see what was going on. Why put Jet Li in a film if you're not going to use his martial arts skills? Surely not for his acting?

  • remo

    He's there to pad out the roster and help the international box office take.

  • GazzO

    You're unfortunately right.

  • Rhythm-X

    Between his serious turns in FEARLESS, DANNY THE DOG, and WARLORDS, and his adept handling of comic material in LAST HERO IN CHINA and FONG SAI YUK (and THE EXPENDABLES, honestly), you could do a lot worse than to hire Jet Li for his acting.

  • D.Z.

    Mostly agree with you, though I felt Sly's fights seemed believable. And I'm guessing Statham was basically intended as a potential surrogate for Sly's successor, which is why they're so close together. I also felt you glossed on Rourke, as I consider his scenes the best in the film. I also don't feel Jet was as wasted as he could've been, but I do agree he should have more MA scenes. Actually, I thought Austin was wasted more, to be honest.

  • John

    The film was awesome…. maybe you should check your testosterone levels Ogden.

  • Goldie_Hawn_Golden_Shower

    This movie sucked major donkey cock!!! Wow do u not know how to shoot an action scene Mr. Sly Stallone??? What the fuck is with the quick edit cuts and close up that you can't see a goddamn thing?? This movie was a circle jerk between Sly and Statham, and everyone else is left dead in the water.. What a freaking waste of an amazing cast and no more directing action movie Mr. Sly!!!

  • Goldie_Hawn_Golden_Shower

    You want a balls of steel kind of action movie, go watch Undisputed 3 by far the best American action movie this year or last year!!!

  • GazzO

    I agree he's a very good actor in his Chinese films, but in my opinion, when he's got to struggle with the English language, it inevitably takes away from his acting performances.

  • Kungfusamurai

    I usually gauge the quality of a film based on it's media hype. The rule is the heavier the media blitz, the lower the quality.
    If they had at least had some good fights with guys like Jet Li, I'd check it out. But it sounds like the actors, just like the characters in the film, were Expendable.

  • reefer

    I haven't seen this yet, but the whole thing kinda reminds me of Sammo Hung's Eastern Condors. The whole huge action cast thing. Condors had Hung, Yuen Biao, Yuen Wah, Yasuaki Karata, Ching Ying Lam, Dick Wei, Billy Chow, James Tien, Wu Ma, etc. Loved that movie.

  • Rhythm-X

    CONDORS is a perfect example of how to do this sort of thing the right way. Then again, it really IS an 80s action movie of exactly the sort EXPENDABLES was supposed to be a throwback to, so no big surprise there.

  • smush

    I thought that maybe by this stage in the game Stallone might be willing to take on the “tough old grizzled commander” role and let the other guys have the spotlight in the fights. Unfortunately there is no retirement age for egotism, narcissism, and self-importance. The movie does blow stuff up real good, but I was hoping for much more than that.

  • uwillloose

    Who was the fight choreographer for this?? Those fights were terrible for such a great cast… I agree, Undisputed 3 is the best fight movie this year!!! Hollywood cant do fight scenes right!!!

  • Dinopower95

    Sly ruined the fight between Jet and Dolph. I mean Corey Yuen could've done a better job flimming the fight himself but no we can't have Sly beig upstage by Corey Yuen let alone Jet Li.

  • Rhythm-X

    Cory Yuen was the fight choreographer, though I don't know if he worked on any scenes not involving Jet Li. It's important to note that it's not his fault the film's editing is total garbage, lacking any sense of rhythm, location, or anything else that makes an on-screen fight truly work.

    It's always more painful to see something flirt with greatness and completely screw it up than it is to see a hunk of outright garbage that never had any chance of being good.

  • Adhipar

    Just watched this film, the 1st half is lame, the 2nd half could be a pure & delightful joy if there aren't too many close up shots. May be you need your glasses when filming, Sly. The story and music score could also be better.

    However, it's quite entertaining to see Li & Statham vs Daniels and especially Couture vs Austin mixed with explosion, destruction, gun fight & combat etc. So it's like this film lose the battles (in story, acting, drama, score dept) but finally win the war by winning the final battle. And I agree that we have a great recipe here, because I want more of those fights!

    As Sly has announced for a sequel, I would suggest that he should 'died' on the beginning of that sequel so he could be working fully as a director. Sorry to say, but his presence in this film is overshadow by others charisma. He has some of the best scenes but somehow they are not convincing. I guess, age don't lie.

    Just create vehicle for lots of fights, less closeup and score from the team who made score for Merantau which I think one of the best score for action film.

    Here's some fights that I would like to see : Li vs Jaa or Chupong, Lundgren vs Zaror, Couture vs Nathan Jones, Statham vs Snipes or Raffaeli, Crews vs Bosworth. Any suggestion?……Then add some cameos from action stars ie Dacascos, Rothrock, Griffith, Conaway, Norton, Wincott etc.

    Sorry for my english….

  • Tim1019blue

    In general the review is fairly accurate. But, I would take exception to the disappointment written by Gazz Ogden in relation to the martial arts quotient not being more prevalent. While it’s fair to criticize the way the Jet Li and Dolph Lundgren fight was staged it has to be note that “The Expendables” is much more of an action movie then it is a martial arts movie. In the realm of action the movie delivered in “spades” as sort of homage to big action movies that were so popular in the 80’s.

    Mr. Ogden was also disappointed with the use of some of the actors in “The Expendables” due to the lack of screen some of the talent was given. Again I have to disagree, if one takes a look at big ensemble pictures like this from the past (i.e. “Great Escape,” “The Magnificent Seven” and “The Dirty Dozen” to name a few) it’s never about the fairness of screen time shared but instead what the particular actor does with his two or three big moments in the film. In this regard I thought the cast delivered whether it was Couture talking about his “cauliflower ear” or Crews introducing everyone to his “lady” everyone really performed well!

    I thoroughly enjoyed “The Expendables” and would recommend it to anyone looking to see a through back action movie that shows that Sly Stallone isn’t too old to deliver a blow with major punch!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DZAB5UTLDIKDL6PP4MZE3BHBYA D.Z.

    BTW, I just found out Sly's on Twitter @TheSlyStallone.

  • http://www.wirthconsulting.org Kraak Mo

    Nevertheless, I can't wait to see it, but I'm not going to endure the box office “experience” in order to do so. Netflix, here I come!

  • TheWanderer

    While not a perfect film, this is the best action movie I have seen in the theater in a very very long time. They don't make films this cool in hollywood anymore, because hollywood has become fairyland. I find it fucked when the best directors that have balls get shunned in hollywood by the crooked evil viacom bastards who have no soul. I find the Expendables a great wake up call for all of hollywood, because im so sick of stupid cgi comic book movies that I want to puke. James Cameron can take his gay avatar movie and shove it, I will take 10 Stallone movies over that shit anyday of the year.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Barbara-Guillard/100000932044021 Barbara Guillard

    I havn't seen it yet but the first question i asked was anyone who did ? “How did they Diz or diminish Jet Li. There you have it your review supported my suspicions. This film will be on the bottom of the pile for a while i guess then.

  • BobtheBarbarian

    I felt the same way you did, when i found the expendables page on IMDB and saw the list of actors I about came in my pants, so i was very excited for a whole year for this movie, when I found that IMDB had added a plot, I read it, and immediately lost interest. Still I went and seen it, and it was probably the most disappointing thing in my life. the movie gets a 1 out of 10 on my scale, that 1 for the scene with terry crews and his shotgun blowing people apart.

  • Fdsdfs

    That is exactly how I felt.